1.1
As part of its mandate, the NCEUS is required to review labour laws in
the informal sector, consistent with labour rights, and with the requirements
of expanding growth of industry and services, and improving productivity and
competitiveness. Further, the Commission is required to review the social
security system available for labour in the informal sector, and to make
recommendations for expanding its coverage. Moreover, the Commission has been
asked to recommend measures necessary for bringing about improvement in the
productivity of enterprises and generation of large scale employment
opportunities. The present report on
comprehensive legislation to ensure minimum conditions of work and social security
to unorganised workers addresses some of these issues related to the informal
sector.
1.2
The Commission is aware that certain fundamental and foundational issues
such as the provision of education, health, rural roads, sanitation, housing,
provision of electricity and other basic infrastructure impact on the well
being and livelihoods of the workers in the unorganized sector. The provision
of these services and infrastructure is being addressed in various schemes of
central and the state governments. While recognizing the importance of these issues,
the Commission has chosen to focus on issues which are directly concerned with
unorganized sector workers qua
workers and the growth of enterprises in this sector.
1.3
In doing this, the Commission has followed a three fold approach. It has
first advocated a minimum level of protective social security for the workers,
which can be both supplemented and progressively enhanced. Second, it is
recommending, in this Report, a set of measures, most of which are incorporated, along with the proposed social security
measures, in two comprehensive Bills, for regulation of minimum conditions of
work in the unorganized agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. Third, it
has examined and made recommendations for the enhancement of employment and
incomes and livelihood promotion. The main recommendations, which in its
opinion should get overriding and immediate priority in the scheme of things
will be submitted soon to government in the form of an Action Programme for the
Unorganised Sector, which also address issues relating to the Unorganised
Sector in a holistic manner.
1.4
The Commission has examined the conditions of work of the Unorganised
Sector Workers at great length. Its findings form part of a detailed Report on Conditions of Work and Promotion
of Livelihoods in the Unorganised Sector, which will be submitted to
government within the next few weeks. Some of the findings of this Report which
have a bearing on the recommendations being made here are the following:
a) The Commission has defined the unorganised
sector in non-agriculture as consisting of all unincorporated private
enterprises owned by individuals or households engaged in the sale and
production of goods and services operated on a proprietary or partnership basis
and with less than ten total workers. In the case of agriculture, the
operational holding is treated as an enterprise. The Plantation sector is
excluded from this definition.
b)
According to the Commission’s definition, 64 per cent of the unorganised
sector workers are in agriculture, while the remaining are in non-agriculture.
A majority of these workers – 64.8 per cent of agricultural workers and 62.8
per cent of unorganised sector non-agriculture are self-employed. Casual wage
workers comprise 34.6 per cent of the agricultural workers, and 19.8 per cent
of the unorganised sector non-agricultural workers.
c)
Compared to the Commission’s estimates, other official estimates, such
as the Director General of Employment and Training (DGET) and the Annual Survey
of Industries (ASI) indicate that a much smaller share of the workforce is in
the organised sector. According to the DGET figures, the percentage of workers
in the organised sector in 2004-05 is 5.8 whereas the Commission’s estimate
indicates that this percentage is 13.7. The difference arises largely because
the DGET estimates do not reckon with informal
employment in the organised sector. The Commission finds that while these
unorganised/informal workers (casual, contract or even regular) may be employed
in the organised sector, they share the
characteristics of wage workers in the unorganised sector i.e. they do not have
any employment or social protection. Since existing official data describes
such workers as unorganised sector workers, and since they share all the
characteristics of informality, the ambit of our analysis and recommendations
extends beyond unorganised sector workers
to unorganised/informal workers.
d)
Unorganised workers constitute almost the entire universe of the poor.
The Commission’s results show that there is layering of poverty, incomes and
employment among the unorganised workers. Agricultural labourers are the most
vulnerable, followed by other casual workers, marginal farmers in agriculture,
the self-employed in own account enterprises in rural and then in urban areas
etc.
e)
According to our findings, in 2004-05, 90.7 per cent of agricultural
labourers and 64.5 per cent of rural and 52,.3 per cent of casual
non-agricultural wage received a wage below the national minimum wage
designated by the Central government (Rs. 66 per day). Even 57.3 per cent of
unorganised regular workers in rural areas, and 47.2 per cent in urban areas,
received a wage below this minimum.
f)
Among workers in own account enterprises, the gross value added per
worker in 1999-00 was lower than the comparable minimum wage level for 57 per
cent of rural Own Account Workers (OAW) workers and 30 per cent of urban OAW
workers. Returns were much lower among the self employed in rural areas, and
among women headed enterprises.
g)
The Commission has noted that the socially deprived groups (SC, ST,
women etc.) predominate in the most vulnerable occupations. For example, SC/ST
workers are 43.5 per cent of casual labour. Women form a large (and growing)
chunk of homeworkers. Muslim workers, particularly low caste Muslims, predominate
in low earning self-employment oriented activities (19.4 per cent of
self-employed non-agricultural workers are Muslim).
h)
The Commission has also examined in depth the condition of farmers,
focusing on marginal and small farmers. Although these farmers are efficient
producers, due to small holdings and lack of support, their income from
agriculture is less than their meagre consumption expenditure; the debt burden
on them from informal lenders is very high; and the state support to them in
terms of marketing support, extension services etc. is very meagre and much
lower than that available to medium-large farmers. As with other unorganised
workers, they do not have any social protection.
i)
Casual wage workers and home workers, as also low paid regular workers
work for long hours, without health and safety regulations, and are not
entitled to overtime rates, weekly holidays etc.
1.5
These conditions indicate that there is a strong case for government
regulation and support in the case of these workers, However, we have noted
that a two fold approach is needed to improve the livelihoods and conditions of
work of these workers.
1.6
For those workers who are employed by others, we have observed that
there are some minimum standards of work that are being regulated for both
formal as well as informal workers in a large number of countries across the
world. These include subjects such as minimum wages, hours of work,
non-discrimination, payment of overtime, periodic paid holidays etc. The
Commission has taken the view that protecting minimum conditions of work is
both a matter of right and human dignity. However, we are also of the view that
this is entirely consistent with the needs of development as well as a growth
oriented economy.
1.7
We have examined the existing regulation of the condition of workers in
the unorganised sector in India and the laws that apply to wage workers in the
unorganised sector, fully or partially. The Commission has concluded that
existing laws cover the basic conditions of work of unorganised workers in a
piece-meal and inadequate manner.
1.8
Further, the Commission is of the view that focused attention is clearly
also required to enhance the earnings and livelihood of these workers. We have
considered the large number of initiatives that already exist to do this.
However, the Commission does not find the present scope of policies and
programmes adequate to protect and promote the livelihoods of these workers.
Indeed, several of the recent changes have made it more difficult for
unorganised workers in many sectors and locations to eke out a living and for
unorganised enterprises to survive and grow. This Commission views the
protection and promotion of livelihoods as a necessary condition for ensuring
decent conditions of work to the unorganised sector workers.
1.9
As part of our ongoing work, the Commission is finalising a number of
detailed reports on issues such as Credit, Marketing and Technology; Skills;
Growth Poles; Employment Strategy; as well as a Technical Report on Conceptual
Issues and Size and Contribution of the Unorganised Sector. At this stage,
however, as stated earlier, the Commission has formulated a number of
recommendations on employment and livelihood improvement which we will be
submitting soon to government in the form of an Action Plan.
1.10
However, the purpose of this Report is to focus on the rationale and
need for comprehensive legislative protection for both agricultural and
unorganised non-agricultural workers and to highlight the Commission’s
recommendations in these matters.
2. A Review of the Principal
Recommendations of Earlier Commissions
2.1
The Commission has examined the findings and recommendations of a number
of earlier Commissions and Committees and has attempted to situate its own
findings and recommendations in the context of these.
2.2
The First National Commission on Labour (FNCL) under the
Chairmanship of Justice P. B. Gajendragadkar submitted its Report in 1969. The
FNCL devoted attention to labour in the unorganised sector. The main
recommendations of the Gajendragadkar Commission included:
a)
First hand detailed surveys from time to time to understand the problems
of the different categories of unorganised labour.
b)
Legislative protection by the state for unorganised/ unprotected labour.
c)
Simplification of legislative and administrative procedures applicable
to small establishments.
d)
Expediting education and organization in the field of unorganised
labour.
e)
As there is no alternative to the existing implementation machinery,
what exists should be reinforced, and the inspection system should be
strengthened.
f)
Steps for the protection of workers against middlemen, and development
of self-help through co-operatives. Co-operatives should pay adequate wages and
bonus, and give employment opportunities to the underemployed and unemployed
among them (pp.434-35).
2.3
The National Commission on Self employed Women and Women Workers in the
Informal Sector (NCSEW), under the Chairpersonship of Smt. Ela Bhatt
submitted its report (Shramshakti: Report of the National Commission on Self
employed Women and Women in the Informal Sector) in 1988. The NCSEW recommended enlarging the definition of work
done by women to include all paid and unpaid activities performed within the
home or outside as an employee or on ‘own account.’
2.4
In the view of the NCSEW, the single most important intervention towards
improving the economic status of poor women working in the informal sector of
the economy would be to devise strategies which would enhance their ownership
and control over productive assets.
2.5
The NCSEW noted the flagrant violation of statutory provisions regarding
payment of wages, safety regulations, provision of housing and medical
facilities, accident compensation and so on. It felt the need for more
stringent observance of existing labour laws and the introduction of deterrent
penalty clauses. The NCSEW recommended simplification of judicial procedures,
particularly to enable unorganised workers to obtain legal redress without
undue harassment.
2.6
For domestic workers, the NCSEW recommended the introduction of a system
of registration. It felt that, in view of the existing trends of exploitation,
it was extremely important to fix a minimum wage, and to pass legislation to
regulate conditions of employment, social security and security of employment.
2.7
The NCSEW observed that the rates of minimum wage are low and have to be
increased keeping in view the requirements of the woman worker and her
family. Piece rates must be so fixed as
to enable women workers to earn for 8 hours of work a wage equal to the time-rated
minimum wage. Where work is carried out at home due to which the employer saves
on installation cost and equipment, an additional amount at 25 per cent of the
minimum wage should be paid. There should also be a national or regional
minimum wage. Despite the Equal Remuneration Act 1976, wage discrimination is
widely prevalent. This must be corrected through better enforcement and wider
dissemination of the law. The Commission concluded that there is a tendency to
classify the tasks generally done by women as those of a slightly inferior
nature. It recommended that this should be corrected, and one way of doing this
is to broad base into a single category the activities requiring work of a
similar nature.
2.8
The NCSEW recommended the setting up of an Equal Opportunities
Commission under a central law, and also that such a Commission should have
wide powers of investigation, direction, advice and monitoring.
2.9
It further recommended the establishment of Tripartite Boards, as no
law, however well conceived, would benefit women workers unless they had a
major hand in the implementation of the laws. The Tripartite Boards have to be
constituted in such a manner that workers have as many representatives as the
government and the employers. The Tripartite Boards will regulate
implementation of legislation and also contribute to making women workers
visible, and empower them to be equal partners and participants in the
production process.
2.10Another recommendation of the NCSEW
was that a separate wing should be set up in the Labour Department for
unorganised workers with adequate number of women employees at various places.
2.11 The NCSEW also felt that no
solution to the problems of women at work would be complete without taking into
account their reproductive functions, which can be effectively facilitated
through maternity benefit and childcare. Maternity benefits, on the scale
provided under the Maternity Benefit Act, should be universally available to
all women. The responsibility for this should be borne by all employers, irrespective
of whether or not they employed women, through a levy calculated as a
percentage of the wage bill, and placed in a separate fund from which maternity
benefit could be provided. In the case of a large number of women like
home-based workers and others, where the employer is not identifiable, the
responsibility for providing maternity benefits must lie with the State
governments.
2.12 The NCSEW noted that though
childcare facilities were provided in various labour laws, these were not being
implemented, and had in fact led to the retrenchment of women workers since the
employers wanted to avoid the statutory responsibilities that the law imposed.
Hence, it was necessary to introduce an extended system of childcare throughout
the country to reduce the burden on women and to facilitate the all round
development of the child.
2.13 The NCSEW emphasized the need for
regulating working hours in the informal sector where there is considerable
exploitation of the poor. It recommended that piece-rates be converted into
daily wages based on the normal quantum of work completed at a healthy pace,
and that health insurance including compensation for accidents should be
available to women workers. Every workplace had to assure safety to the
workers. The Commission recommended that a comprehensive law on health and
safety be formulated and enacted.
2.14 The National Commission on Rural
Labour (NCRL) was appointed in 1987 ‘to look into the working
conditions of this vulnerable section of our society and the implementation of
social legislation for their protection.’ The NCRL submitted its report in
1991. The Commission recommended a multi-dimensional strategy to lift rural
labourers out of poverty. This included creation of an infrastructure to
improve productivity and employment; enforcement of minimum wages and social
security; introduction of central legislation for agricultural labour providing
security of employment, prescribed hours of work, payment of prescribed wages
and machinery for dispute settlement; introduction of a system of registration
and to provide identity cards to these workers; and creation of a Welfare Fund
to set up with employers’ contribution in the form of a cess on land, and a
nominal contribution from agricultural labour.
2.15 The NCRL made specific recommendations
for various categories of workers, including handloom workers, beedi workers,
construction workers, brick kiln workers, toddy tappers, fishermen, leather
workers, sweepers, boned labourers and migrant labourers. It recommended a
change in the Beedi Cigar Workers Act 1966, in order to establish unambiguously
the employer-employee relationship in the case of homeworkers. It also
suggested some changes in the existing Inter State Migrant Workmen (Regulation
of Employment and Conditions of Service) Act, 1979 (ISMW). It recommended that
the definition of migrant workmen should be expanded to cover all migrants,
whether they come on their own or through contractors, or change contractors
after entering a recipient State.
Amendments should be made to allow third parties to file complaints. The
liability of the principal employer should be defined more clearly to prevent
him from escaping liability. The
contractor should be made liable for the breach of the Act either by him or by
the subcontractor.
2.16 The NCRL also recommended a minimum
wage of Rs. 20 per day at 1990 prices as the subsistence wage, further that no
employment should be allowed at less than this level.
2.17 The Second National Commission of
Labour (SNCL), which
submitted its Report in 2002, made a number of significant recommendations on
reform and simplification of labour laws in the country. It recommended the
grouping of laws into five broad categories and the new laws to cover workers
in industries employing twenty or more workers.
2.18 The SNCL was specifically asked to
make recommendations on umbrella legislation for the unorganised sector workers
and it made a specific proposal in this regard, which we discuss below.
2.19 Thus, the earlier Commissions have
tended to view the regulation of conditions of work and the protection and
promotion of livelihoods in an integral framework. This is also the approach of
this Commission.
3. Issue of Comprehensive
Legislation for the Unorganised Non-agricultural and Agricultural Workers
3.1
In the detailed Report on Conditions of Work, the Commission has brought
out the lack of comprehensive legal protection to minimum conditions of work
for unorganised sector workers. It is also clear that voluntary efforts to
ensure minimum conditions of work can, at best, supplement the primary efforts
by the state to ensure these conditions.
3.2
The approach towards ensuring minimum conditions of work through
legislation can follow one of three possible approaches viz. (i) extension of
coverage of existing laws to the unprotected sector; (ii) providing a
comprehensive legislation, replacing existing laws, to cover the existing
sector; (iii) providing a comprehensive legislation which extends protection to
the unprotected sector, and which provides a universal minimum, but which leaves
the ground open for them to secure better working conditions through existing
laws. In the discussion which follows, we note that all three approaches have
been under consideration from time to time.
3.3
In the 37th session of the Labour Ministers Conference in
1987, it was generally viewed that the problem was not of lack of Central
Legislation, but the implementation of the existing laws such as the Minimum
Wages Act, the Equal Remunerations Act and other such laws that are applicable
to the unorganised sector workers including workers in agriculture. However, since then, the issue of a new and
separate regulation for workers in the unorganised sector have been discussed
in successive sessions of the Labour Ministers’ conference and the Indian
Labour Conference, and this has consistently been recommended by various
commissions and committees.
3.4
We have earlier noted that whereas the National Commission for
Self-employed Women favoured simplification of existing laws and strengthening
of the tri-partite structure of implementation, the National Commission on
Rural Labour had recommended a Central legislation for agricultural workers.
3.5
Following upon the recommendations of the NCRL, the Ministry of Labour
and Employment (MOLE) proposed a comprehensive legislation for regulation of
employment, conditions of service and provides for welfare measures of
agricultural workers in 1997. The Bill
contained provision for regulation of conditions of work, welfare, and social
security. The definition of agricultural workers covered wage workers only.
For carrying out the welfare provisions, the Bill provided for registration of
labourers and issue of identity cards and the constitution of Agricultural
Welfare Boards. The provisions with respect to regulation of conditions of work
included regulation of hours of work, overtime rates, payment of ‘prescribed’
wages, continuity of employment, child-care facilities, safety measures as
prescribed. It also prohibited unfair labour practice interfering with the
right of agricultural workers to enrol or continue as union member,
discriminating against, restraining, or coercing any agricultural worker
because of trade union activity, and victimizing any agricultural worker. For
dispute resolution, the Bill provided for a three-tier structure with
conciliation officers for mediating in and promoting settlement of agricultural
disputes, appointment of arbitrators at second level and appellate authorities
at the third level.
3.6
The Second National Labour Commission (SNCL) was specifically asked to
examine the issue of comprehensive legislation for unorganised sector workers.
The SNCL proposed an Act to consolidate and amend the laws relating to the
regulation of employment and welfare of workers in the unorganised sector in
India and to provide protection and social security to these workers. The comprehensive legislation proposed by
the SNCL was thus intended to cover social security and welfare, regulation of
employment and conditions of work, as well as promotion of livelihoods. The
legislation was intended to cover employments, both in the agricultural and
non-agricultural sectors, which were to be listed in the Schedule appended to
the Act.
3.7
The essence of the proposed Umbrella legislation was the removal of poverty of the working population
of India through improving their productivity, quality of work, enhancing
income earning abilities and increasing its bargaining power. Its aim was to
improve the quality of employment, provide a decent life to the workers and
integrate them with the growing opportunities in the country. The basic
approach of the legislation is recognition and protection for all types of
unorganised sector workers regardless of industry, occupation, work status, and
personal characteristics.
3.8
The provisions covered by the umbrella legislation included social
security, health and safety, working
hours, holidays, prohibition of child labour, workers right to access
the common natural resources to develop and increase his productivity through
work, traditional right related to work
and space, protection from unfair labour practices, retrenchment without a
reasonable cause, education, training
and skill development. The proposed legislation also recommended record
maintenance such as a register of workers employed, muster roll cum wage
payment register and wage slips to be issued to the workers with the seal of
the employer. The SNCL recommended that the Umbrella legislation should be
integrated into other existing laws, policies and schemes that basically
control the economies of these sectors to be more effective.
3.9
The SNCL proposed a Central Board at the centre and State Boards at the
State Levels for the administration of the Act. It recommended employment based
Boards at the State levels. It has also recommended a district level Boards at
the District level and Worker Facilitation Centres (WFCs) at lower level. The
State Board (SB) was placed with responsibility of arbitration in disputes
between the employers and workers’ organisations if agreed by the parties and
conciliate and arbitrate in disputes pertaining to the use of common property
resources by the workers in the event of the matter being brought before it by
one or more District Boards. The SB
also had the responsibility to ensure payment of minimum wages to workers as
prescribed under the law by the Central or the State Governments and also
ensure timely payment of dues of such workers. In relation to the self- employed workers, the SB was to take
suitable measures to ensure they earn fair incomes, receive benefits of social
security, training, and other development services, facilitate a support system
that provide access to financial services, market infrastructure, and
infrastructure like power, roads, warehousing, workplace, information and skill
development interlinked in a holistic way. The District Boards had the responsibility to ensure
implementation of the Act and other relevant labour legislations; conciliate or
arbitrate in disputes pertaining to common property resources in the event of
such matter being brought before it by one or more WFCs. The WFC had the
responsibility to resolve any dispute arising out of employment relating to
wages and working conditions through tripartite or multipartite conciliation.
In case of failure of conciliation, WFCs should undertake arbitration to
facilitate speedy resolution of disputes. They may also take the help of Lok
Adalats or Labour Courts.
3.10No
separate grievance redressal mechanism was suggested in the draft Bill of the
SNCL. However, the Board was to encourage the parties to settle their issues and
disputes relating to wages and conditions of work peacefully by bi-partite or
multi-partite negotiations. The labour court or Lok Adalat having
jurisdiction over that area shall be empowered to hear disputes and try offences
under this Act. The State Government shall constitute the concerned Appellate
Authority for the above matters.
3.11As a follow up to the SNCL
recommendations, the MOLE also proposed a comprehensive legislation for
regulation of employment and conditions of service of unorganized sector
workers and to provide for their safety, social security, health and welfare
(The Unorganised sector Workers Bill, 2004, subsequently also revised by the
Ministry in 2005). This Draft Bill
drew upon the recommendations of the SNCL and covered both wage workers as well
as self-employed workers, in all sectors. However, only workers in scheduled
employments were proposed for coverage. The Bill provided for Schemes of social
welfare to be funded through contributions by governments and workers and their
implementation through Workers Facilitation Centres (WFCs) and State/Central
Welfare Boards. The Bill also has
provisions for minimum conditions of work, including an eight hours work day
with half an hour break, overtime at rate of twice his ordinary rate of wages;
and payment of wages at prescribed rates not less than the Statutory Minimum
Wages. No separate dispute resolution mechanism was been provided in the Draft
Bill.
3.12Another comprehensive legislation
for regulation of employment, conditions of service, and provision of welfare
measures of agricultural workers has been made in a private member’s Bill
(Hannan Mollah 2001) The definition, coverage and the main provisions of the
Bill are broadly similar to the MOLE Bill (1997). It, however, proposes a
system of enforcement by inspectors and a two tier dispute resolution structure
consisting of the conciliation machinery and an agricultural tribunal.
3.13Two Bills proposing comprehensive
legislation for regulation of employment and conditions of service, social
security and welfare of unorganized sector workers have also been proposed by
National Centre for Labour and the National Campaign Committee for Unorganised
Sector Workers in 2005. The Bills cover wage workers, home-based and
out-workers duly registered under the Act but do not include agricultural,
plantation, sericulture, horticulture, poultry farming, animal husbandry
workers and other allied workers and the persons employed in factories and
mines. The Bills provide for the right to livelihood including the right over
common properties and natural resources. They also include provisions for
regulation of working conditions, provide for continuity of employment, bonus
and social security, non-discrimination, and provisions against harassment of
women workers. They also provide for the right to have a uniform social
security card; occupational and other safety measures; vocational training and
guidance, and ensuring special protection for migrant workers. The tri-partite
Boards formed under the proposed Act will be responsible for its
administration. Enforcement will be through a system of inspections and trade
unions will be vested with powers of inspectors. For dispute resolution, the
Bill provides for Dispute Resolution Councils and appellate authorities.
3.14The comprehensive Bill formulated by
the Ministry of Labour and Employment, was forwarded to this Commission for
review and comments. The National Advisory Council of the government formulated
a stand alone Bill on social security for unorganised sector workers which was
also forwarded to this Commission for review. The Commission deliberated on the
issues of social security, conditions of work and livelihoods, and prepared two
separate Draft Bills on social security and conditions of work which were
circulated for feedback.
3.15These Bills, along with the Bills
prepared earlier by the Ministry of Labour and the National Advisory Council
were considered in the 40th Indian Labour Conference, which is the main
tri-partite consultative forum, in its meeting held in December 2005. The
Conference suggested that the NCEUS Draft Bill be used as a basis for further
discussions. It, however, suggested that social security and conditions of work
be integrated in the same Bill and that separate Bills be formulated for
agricultural and non-agricultural workers.
3.16The Commission considered the views
of the ILC, along with the views and feedback from other stake holders and the
States and in May 2006, the Commission finalised its report on social security
and its recommendations on a Bill and a National Social Security Scheme to
which all unorganised workers would be eligible within a period of five years.
It may be noted that the Commission submitted a stand alone proposal on social
security at this stage because it was considered that such a proposal would be
institutionally feasible and implementation could begin within a short period
of time.
3.17The Commission’s proposal on social
security has been considered by the Ministry of Labour and Employment and by
the Cabinet. The views of the Ministry and the government have been summarised
in the Ministry’s report to the 41st ILC held in April 2007.
4.1
The preceding discussion indicates that there has been a growing
consensus on the need for a comprehensive legislation. There is also some agreement among the stake
holders that the new law needs to have a different implementation mechanism
involving tripartite regulatory bodies and having inbuilt systems of
self-regulation. There is also some consensus that the needs of the
agricultural and non-agricultural workers with regard to their working
conditions are very different and that the new proposed bill should address the
needs of agricultural and non-agricultural workers separately either within the
same bill or in two distinct bills one each for agriculture and
non-agricultural sectors.
4.2
The Commission has examined these proposals in the light of its own
findings on the condition of unorganised sector workers, and its analysis of
the existing state of regulation of conditions of work, as well as protection
and promotion of livelihood of the workers in the sector as a whole. It is
noted that the existing proposals differ in scope, coverage and institutional
mechanisms. The general scope of these proposals extends to working conditions,
social security and welfare, and protection and promotion of livelihoods. The coverage
of these proposals varies in as much as some of them are confined only to
agricultural wage workers, while some cover both wage and self-employed workers
in the non-agricultural unorganised sector only, and some encompass all workers
in both the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors. Further, the coverage
may also be confined to listed schedules of employment.
4.3
The Commission concurs with the need for a comprehensive legislation for
the unorganised sector. With regard to social security, the Commission has
already recommended a National Minimum
Social Security Scheme for all unorganised sector workers, which can be
added upon by the states, and has suggested a Draft legislation. Issues
contained therein are already under consideration of government. The Commission
therefore proposed a legislative framework to ensure minimum conditions of work
for all unorganised workers, with special attention being paid to the special
needs of vulnerable sections of the unorganised workers (women, migrants, and homeworkers).
However, given the differences between agricultural and non-agricultural
workers, the Commission recommended two separate Bills (for the agricultural
and non-agricultural workers). Part 1 of these Bills related to conditions of
work. The Commission also made
recommendations with respect to the aspect of livelihood promotion in Part 2 of
the Bills. These two Draft Bills were
publicised by the Commission in February 2007, and a series of state level,
regional and national consultations were held with all stake holders on the
contents of these Bills. In particular, two national consultations were
held with Central Trade Unions and other national organisations representing
unorganised sector workers. A number of views emerged in these consultations which
have been helpful in finalising these Bills. Views received by the Commission
have also been appended to this Report.
4.4
Two main views emerged,
however, which had a bearing on the structure of the Draft Bills as prepared by
the Commission in February 2007. First, it
was argued by the trade unions and national organisations that, although they
welcomed the Commission’s proposals, the Indian Labour Conference (40th
Session) had resolved for composite Bills incorporating both social security
and conditions or work proposals. Second,
a number of responses stated that the Commission’s proposals on livelihood
promotion could be dealt more appropriately through recommendation of policies
or programmes, rather than through legislation.
4.5
The Commission deliberated at length on these two issues. With respect
to the first issue, while the Commission could have left it to government to
synthesise the two proposals if it so desired, the Commission felt that it
could also itself combine its earlier proposal on social security with those on
conditions of work in the two separate Bills for agricultural and
non-agricultural workers. As far as the government was concerned, nothing would
be altered as far as the social security proposals of the NCEUS were concerned.
But the synthesised Bills would be in
line with the Tri-partite conclusions and would, therefore, have greater
acceptability among the stake holders. Further, it was felt, that since the UPA government had clearly committed itself
to a comprehensive protective legislation for agricultural workers in its
Common Minimum Programme, the new synthesised Draft Bill for agricultural
workers would also be more in line with this commitment. For these reasons,
the legislative content of the social security proposals have been incorporated
in the two final Bills.
4.6
As regard the second issue, the Commission has given some responsibility
for welfare and livelihood promotion to the Social Security and Welfare Boards
proposed in the final draft of the Bills. However, the principal
recommendations of the Commission with respect to livelihood promotion are now
being suggested outside of the proposed legislative framework. They will form
part of the detailed Report on Conditions of Work and Livelihood Promotion and
will also be submitted to government in the form of an Action Plan.
5. Need for Separate Bills for
Agricultural Workers and Non Agricultural Wage Workers
5.1
The Commission has proposed two draft Bills regarding the
conditions of work and social security. These are the Agricultural Workers Conditions of Work and Social Security Bill, 2007 (hereafter
referred to as NAWB), and the Unorganised Non-Agricultural Workers
Conditions of Work and Social Security Bill, 2007 (hereafter referred to as
AWB). The first Bill is applicable
to the unorganised agricultural workers (all agricultural wage workers
excluding those eligible for protection under the Plantation Workers Act, and
all marginal and small farmers). The second Bill is applicable to the
unorganised non-agricultural workers i.e. non-agricultural workers in the
unorganised sector as well as unorganised workers in the organised sector who
are not protected by existing laws applicable to that sector, subject to an
income ceiling. Although most of the conditions of work specified under the
Agricultural Workers Bill and the Unorganised Non-agricultural Workers Bill are
similar, the two separate Bills have been provided to take care of specific
issues being faced by the two different sets of workers. The working conditions
differ and separate sets of conditions have been proposed wherever considered
necessary.
5.2
Further, in some States like Tamil Nadu, the present machinery for
enforcement of labour laws for agricultural and non agricultural workers is
different. The laws relating to non agricultural workers are enforced by the
Labour Department whereas for non agricultural workers enforcement is carried
out by the Revenue Department or by another separate machinery. For this
reason, the two Bills prescribe different provisions for the dispute resolution
machinery in the agricultural and non-agricultural sectors.
5.3
As discussed above, each of the Bills incorporate provisions for
regulation of conditions of work and social security. Chapter II of the Bills
deals with conditions of work of the unorganised non agricultural and
agricultural workers respectively. Chapters III to VIII of the Bills relate to
Social Security, Constitution of the Social Security Funds, Constitution,
Powers and Functions of the National and State Social Security and Welfare
Boards; provision for registration and implementation of the Scheme. The
provisions with respect to the National Social Security Scheme, the National
Social Security Fund and the National Social Security and Welfare Boards are
identical in the two Bills and are based on the earlier proposals of the
Commission to the government. The Dispute Resolution mechanism for settlement
of disputes arising due to non observance of provisions relating to conditions
of work are specified in Chapter IX of the respective Acts.
5.4
Some of the main recommendations (covered by the Bills) are discussed
below. We also discuss those recommendations which are not part of the proposed
Bills.
6. Main
Recommendations Relating to Conditions of Work
6.1
The Commission is aware that there are a number of laws
which are partly applicable to the unorganised workers. However their domain is
restricted either in terms of coverage of the unorganised workers or in terms
of benefits provided by those laws. Hence, the Commission has provided a
framework providing for minimum conditions of work to all unorganised
workers. The proposed law will,
however, not affect the application of any other State or Central Acts which
apply to the unorganised worker, and if under any existing law, any unorganised
agricultural non-agricultural worker is eligible for superior or better
benefits, he shall continue to be entitled for such superior benefits provided
under those Acts. Further, as the entitlements as provided for in the act are
bare minimum, an wage worker can enter
into an agreement with his/her employer for granting him/her rights or
privileges in respect of any matter which are more favourable to him/ her than
those to which he/she would be entitled under this Act.[1]
6.2
The conditions of work which are prescribed both for agricultural and
non agricultural unorganised wage workers include an eight-hour working day
with at least half-hour break, one paid day of rest, a national minimum wage
for employments not notified under the Minimum Wages Act of states, piece-rate
wages to equal time-rated wages, employments specifically done by women to be
brought on par with employment certified as equivalent, due payment of wages in
time failure of which would attract penal interest, no deduction of wages in the
form of fines, right to organise, non-discrimination on the basis of gender,
social origin, incidence of HIV AIDS and place or origin; adequate safety
equipment to be provided, compensation for accident, protection from sexual
harassment, provision of child care; provision of basic amenities at the
workplace etc. [2]
National Minimum Wage
6.3
The Constitution of India envisages a just and humane society and
accordingly gives place to the concept of living wage in the chapter on
Directive Principles of State Policy. Wages in the organized sector are
determined through negotiations and settlements between employer and employees.
In the unorganised sector, where labour is vulnerable to exploitation due to
illiteracy and having no effective bargaining power, the wages can not be left
to be determined entirely by the interplay of market forces and, therefore,
intervention of the Government becomes necessary both from the perspective of
social justice, and also for increasing efficiency and productivity in the
economy.
6.4
On the recommendation of the Eighth Standing Labour Committee, the
Minimum Wages Bill was introduced in the Central Legislative Assembly in April
1946 and the Act came into force in 1948. Under the Act both State and Central
Government are “Appropriate Governments” for fixation revision of minimum rates
of wages for employments covered by the Schedule to the Act. The schedule is in
two parts, part II of the schedule applicable to the employment in agriculture.
The appropriate government has notified the list of scheduled employment in
part I and part II. At present some employments are not added in the schedule
and the benefits under the Minimum Wages Act are not applicable to the workers
working in such employments.
6.5
The appropriate government fix the minimum rates of wages payable to
employees employed in an employment either specified in part I and Part II of
the schedule, or added to either part by notification under section 27, and
review these wages at intervals not exceeding five years. In fixing or revising
minimum rates of wages, the appropriate government can appoint as many
committees and sub committees as it considered necessary.
6.6
In absence of any attempt
to define the concept of minimum wages the principles and components decided in
cases of minimum wage fixation differ at both Central and State levels and the
concerned Advisory Boards use discretion and their judgment in the absence of a
standard set of criteria. This absence of a uniform set of criteria has been sought
to be filled later on by various attempts which did not prove very useful
because of several shortcomings and constraints.
Principles of Fixation of Minimum Wage and
the Concept of National Minimum Wage
6.7
Minimum wages depend upon the set of minimum needs of the worker and her
family that should be met out of wage earnings and the capacity to pay of a
particular industry. In general, there must be an irreducible ‘minimum’ which
must correspond to a basic subsistence which minimum wages must meet. The
Judgment of the Supreme Court of India in the Case – Crown Aluminium vs.
Workmen, mentions a bare subsistence or minimum wage and stresses that any
employer who pays wages below this minimum would have no right to conduct his
enterprise on such terms.
6.8
Since the factors that could go into the determination of minimum wage
could vary depending upon the economic circumstances of industry/country, a
clearer elucidation is needed of these factors. In December, 1947 the
Government of India appointed a Central Advisory Council for advising on the
issues of fair wage to labour and fair return on capital. This Council
appointed a high powered tripartite committee called the Committee on Fair
Wages which was asked “to determine the principles on which fair wages should
be based and to suggest the line on which these principles should be applied”.
The Committee, in its report submitted in 1948, drew a distinction between
‘minimum wage’, ‘fair wage’ and ‘living wage’. ‘Minimum wage’ according to the
Committee should provide for the maintenance of the efficiency of the worker as
well as his other (current) basic needs. The three concepts were elucidated by
the Committee as follows:
·
Living Wage should enable the wage
earner to provide for himself and his family not merely the bare essentials of
food, clothing and shelter but also a measure of frugal comfort including
education of children, protection against ill health, requirements of social
needs and a measure of insurance against the more important contingencies like
old age.
·
Minimum Wage must provide not merely
for the bare sustenance of life but for preservation of the efficiency of the
worker. For this purpose the minimum wage must also provide for some measure of
education, medical requirements and amenities.
·
Fair Wage: while lower limit of the
fair wage must obviously be the minimum wage, the upper limit is equally set by
what may broadly be called the capacity of the industry to pay.
6.9
In 1957 the 15th Session of Indian Labour Conference (ILC)
emphasized that minimum wage should be need-based in order to ensure minimum
human needs of the industrial workers. The following 5 norms were recommended
by ILC which till date are generally taken as the basis for fixation of minimum
rates of wages: -
(i)
Three consumption units for one earner;
(ii)
Minimum food requirement for 2700 calories per average Indian adult;
(iii)
18 yards of per capita cloth consumption for 4 members i.e. 72 yards per
annum per family;
(iv)
Rent corresponding to the minimum area provided for under Government’s
Industrial Housing Scheme, and
(v)
Fuel, lighting and other ‘miscellaneous’ items of expenditure to
constitute 20 per cent of the total minimum wages.
6.10These norms were to be followed by
all wage-fixing authorities in India. In cases where the minimum wage fixed
fell short of the above level recommended by the ILC it was incumbent on the
concerned authorities to justify the circumstances which prevented them from
pursuing the above norms.
6.11The Supreme Court of India delivered
a Judgement in 1992 in the case of Reptakos Brett and Co. vs. its workmen that
“Children education, medical requirement, minimum recreation including
festival/ceremonies and provision for old age, marriage, etc., should further
constitute 25 per cent of the total minimum wage and used as a guideline in
determining minimum wage.
6.12The First National Commission Labour
(1969) stated clearly that while determining need-based minimum wages the
employer’s capacity to pay should be considered. The FNCL did not make any
attempt to define minimum wage. The FNCL remarked that though national minimum
in the sense of a uniform monetary recommendation for the country as a whole
was neither feasible nor desirable it was possible and necessary to fix
regional minima for different homogeneous regions in each State.
6.13The Third Central Pay Commission (1970-73)
broadly accepted the ILC norms for minimum wage fixation but reviewed the
minimum necessary nutritional standard in order to prepare its diet schedule as
the basis for expenditure estimates at January 1973 prices. Thus, the
Commission recommended a minimum wage of Rs. 196 per month for the lowest
category of Central Government employees.
6.14The question of a national minimum
wage engaged the attention of the Committee on Wage Policy (1973) appointed by
Planning Commission. This Committee headed by Prof. S. Chakraborty, the then
Member, Planning Commission, recommended national minimum wage as also general
minimum wage Centre-wise and region-wise. The Committee observed, “Rs. 40 at
the October, 1972 prices as the national minimum”. The Study Group on Wages,
Incomes and Prices (1978), chaired by
S. Bhootalingam, after carrying out an elaborate exercise, recommended a
monthly wage of Rs. 100/- per month (at 1978 prices as) as national minimum, to
be gradually raised to Rs. 150/- per month (at 1978 prices).
6.15The 31st session of the
Labour Ministers’ Conference held in July, 1980 stressed that minimum wages
should not be prescribed below the poverty line worked out by the Planning
Commission and wherever the existing wages are below this line they should be
brought at par with the poverty line.
6.16The Committee of Secretaries, in its
meeting held in July, 1981 noted that in view of the numerous spatial and
characteristic diversities of various employments and their locations in our
large country, the fixation and implementation of minimum wages have to
overcome a lot of conceptual problems and operational constraints. The
Committee suggested a duality of minimum wages: an absolute minimum called the
‘National Floor Level’ should be applicable to those employments which have not
been included in the Schedule of the Act, while the other, pegged at higher
level (i.e. higher than the National Floor Level). The idea of a National Floor
Level was conceived as a statutory rock-bottom below which the minimum wages
cannot be legally allowed to fall in any employment anywhere in India. But
there should be no bar to the fixation of minimum wages above this floor level
wherever it would be possible to peg it up.
6.17A similar concept was mooted by
another Committee of Secretaries of six States (viz. Bihar, Kerala, Manipur,
Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and Pondicherry) constituted in 1981 on the
recommendations of the Sub-committee of the Labour Ministers’ Standing
Committee. This Committee introduced another new concept of ‘general minimum
wage’ which was defined as the lowest wage essential to meet the bare minimum
needs of workers and their families. The general minimum wage envisaged the
statutory bottom level below which wage rate in any schedule employment is not
legally permitted to fall; but according to the Committee there should be no
bar to the fixing of minimum wage above this general minimum in cases where
concerned employment with a better financial health might be capable of paying
higher wages.
6.18The India Labour Conference in its
meeting held in November 1985, expressed the view that till such time as a
national wage was not feasible, it would be desirable to have regional minimum
wages in regard to which Central Government may lay down the guidelines. The
minimum wages should be revised at regular periodicity and should be linked
with rise in the cost of living. Accordingly, the Government issued guidelines
in July, 1987 for setting up of Regional Minimum Wages Advisory Committees.
These Committees, renamed subsequently as Regional Labour Ministers’
Conference, made a number of recommendations which include reduction in
disparities in minimum wages of different States of a region, setting up of
Inter-State Co-ordination Council, consultation with neighbouring States while fixing
/ revising minimum wages, etc.
6.19The National Commission on Rural
Labour (1991) defined minimum wage as a minimum subsistence wage, which must be
paid to workers by all employers on socio-economic considerations. If the
worker was paid below the minimum wage his efficiency would suffer and as a
result productivity would decline. Minimum wage, being the subsistence wage,
cannot differ much in physical terms from employment to employment and from
employer to employer. Taking into account the poverty line as determined by the
Planning Commission, the average number of earners in an agricultural labour
household, the average number of employment days, and three consumption units
per earner, the NCRL determined Rs. 20 as being the minimum wage in rural India
in 1990-91. Following the principles enunciated by the NCRL, the Central
Government raised the national floor level minimum wage to Rs.40 per day in
1998 and further to Rs.45 from December 1,
1999 and Rs.50 per day from September 1, 2002 keeping in view the rise
in consumer price index.
6.20The Second National Commission on
Labour (2002) also considered the issue of minimum wage and recommended a
National Minimum Wage based on the principles recommended by the 15th
ILC. The SNCL recommended that the wage be revised from time to time and have a
component of dearness allowance linked to the cost of living so that it could
be adjusted every six months. The wage itself could be revised every five years
and states could notify the minimum wage, which could vary from region to
region, but could not be less than the National Minimum Wage. The SNCL
recommended that wages not be fixed separately for each scheduled
employment as is presently the case.
6.21In 2003, the Central Advisory Board,
expressing concern at the wide disparity in minimum wages that existed and the
lack of clarity on the concept, norms and parameters of wage fixation,
constituted a Working Group to go into these issues. The Working Group
submitted its report in 2003.
6.22The Working Group decided to adopt the
principles laid down by the ILC of 1957 and elaborated by the Supreme Court
judgment of 1992. Accordingly, it took a minimum calorie norm of 2700 calorie
per consumption unit, 3 consumption units per earner and the actual estimated
wage employment days for agricultural labourers. The Group, then used the NSS
50th Round survey data on consumption expenditure to fix the average
consumption expenditure which would yield a consumption of 2700 calories per
consumption unit. It found that this expenditure level covered adequate
non-food expenditure (as per norm). Working backward, it determined Rs. 66 to
be the National Minimum Wage as in 2002-03. The Committee recommended that this
wage could replace the different state level minimum wages for different schedules
of employment. With effect from February, 2004, all the States/UTs Governments
have been requested by the Labour Minister to ensure fixation/revision of
minimum rates of wages in all the scheduled employments at not below Rs.66 per
day. However, there is no legal backup to the national floor level minimum wage
fixed by the Government of India.
6.23From the review of the existing
analysis and recommendations on the subject of minimum wage, it is clear that
it has been felt throughout that a minimum wage linked to the core subsistence
needs of the workers should be available to all workers. It is further clear
that the existing wide variation in the minimum wages have been a matter of
concern to most committees/commissions. With regard to the issue whether a single
minimum wage should be available to all workers, or should form the floor only,
there is some difference of opinion.
6.24This
Commission has taken the view there should be a statutory national minimum wage
which shall represent the lowest level of wage for any employment in the
country.
This wage shall be applicable to all employments presently not covered under
the Minimum Wages Act of the State concerned, and would be applicable to both
wage workers and home workers. Even with respect to the employments covered
under the Minimum Wages Act, the State Government has to ensure that the
Minimum Wage fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, is not lower than the National
Minimum wage. In case, the prescribed minimum wage under the Minimum Wages Act
is lower than the National Minimum Wage, the State Government shall immediately
amend the prescribed minimum wage, to bring it in conformity with the National
Minimum Wage. Even during the intervening period, till the time the State
Government has not amended the prescribed wage under the minimum wages Act, the
worker shall not suffer and shall be eligible to receive the higher National
Minimum Wage.[3]
6.25The National Minimum Wage shall be
fixed by the Central government which shall follow a tri-partite consultative
process, and will be announced within one year. The general principles in the
fixation of the National Minimum Wage will be the minimum basic needs of the
wage and home workers and his/her family. It is seen that the cost of living
among different states, districts or even between the rural areas and urban
areas within one district vary considerably. The government shall consider all
such factors or any other relevant parameters for fixation of National Minimum
Wage.[4] However, the Commission has also examined
and elaborated on the relevant principles in 6.27 below.
6.26The Commission finds that several
committees have adopted a normative approach to define subsistence needs and
minimum wage. The Indian Labour Conference had, in 1957, decided five norms, to
which the Supreme Court judgment of 1992 added a sixth. The 30th
Session of the Labour Ministers Conference in 1980 and NCRL in its Report in
1991, however, adopted an approach which was more grounded in the notion of
‘poverty line’ as determined by the Planning Commission. Its needs to be
mentioned that the ILC norms, were set half a century ago, when the debate on
minimum nutritional norms was in its infancy. Further, even if these norms were
fully valid 50 years ago, they need to be redefined in the present context. In
any case, the basic challenge has been to convert the basic norms into monetary
value since this can be done in a number of alternative ways.
6.27Since 1993, the Government of India
has adopted a definition of ‘poverty line’ which is benchmarked to the consumption
of a minimum amount of calories (2400 Kcals in rural areas, and 2100 Kcals in
urban areas) on a per capita basis in 1973-74, and non-food expenditure by the
expenditure class consuming these calories. The poverty line has provided an
inter-state and inter-temporal basis for interpreting minimum subsistence. It
has also provided a fulcrum for policy decisions. The poverty line is adjusted
according to the cost of living in rural and urban areas and in different
states. These parameters were not available before 1993 but, despite a
considerable degree of debate, have acquired wide acceptability as a notion of
subsistence since then. It will be recalled that the poverty line includes
expenditure on food and non-food items, including clothing, fuel, education,
health care, housing etc. In other words, the poverty line is set at a level
where it can cover the very basic requirements of a family, and except for old
age security, includes some expenditure on the items mentioned by the ILC as
well as the Supreme Court judgment. However, given the level of capability
deprivation faced by the poor in India, it may be argued that the poverty line
does not allow the minimum level of expenditure on some of the basic items such
as education, health, and housing.. A perusal of National Sample Survey data
shows that, even as a proportion of their own consumption expenditure, the poor
spend about eight per cent less than the average on the three items mentioned
above. Similarly, there may be other items in the poor’s consumption which
reflect the deprivation which the poor continue to face, which are not included
in the poverty line. It is for similar reasons that the Supreme Court had
suggested a 25 per cent increase over the basic expenditure level on the norms
suggested by ILC. The Commission is of the view that the poverty line reflects
the subsistence in the current context which
the ILC and other bodies have attempted to define through norms.
However, this subsistence needs to be adjusted upwards to take care of the
deprivation, particularly the capability deprivation that the poor continue to
face. Since the items mentioned in the Supreme Court judgment are already
included in the consumption basket which constitutes the poverty line, a
smaller mark-up over this level may be necessary to represent the expenditure
to be met through minimum wage income. On this basis, the Commission recommends
that that the following parameters could be taken into account in determining
the National Minimum Wage:
(a)
The Monthly Per Capita Consumption Expenditure (MPCE) corresponding to
the poverty line as determined by the Planning Commission;
(b)
A mark-up over this expenditure to take account of the capability
deprivation of poor households.
(c)
The average size of labour households, as shown in surveys
(d)
The average dependent-earner ratio in labour households
(e)
The total average number of total days of employment for labourers as
brought out by the National Sample Survey
(f)
The National Minimum Wage could be fixed for the country as a whole, on
the basis of the above parameters, and the same could be adjusted for rural and
urban areas and different states, as is done for estimating poverty lines at
present.
These parameters can be objectively determined on the
basis of the National Sample Surveys on Consumption, and on
Employment-Unemployment. Such a methodology could be considered by the
government in fixing an announcing the National Minimum Wage.
6.28The fixation of National Minimum
Wage by the government shall be done within one year of the implementation of
the Act. Thereafter, the National Minimum Wage shall be periodically reviewed
by the Central Government through a modality prescribed by the National Board
for Social Security and Welfare for Unorganised Workers.[5]
Till such time as the government fixes and announces the new National Minimum
Wage, the National Minimum Wage fixed by the Labour Ministry shall, after
adjustment for cost of living changes, be deemed to be the National Minimum
Wage under this Act.
6.29It would be noted that the
Commission has not advocated the abolition of the different schedules of the
state level minimum wages. This is because the variation in circumstances
between employments and/or states or locations may warrant a higher wage.
However, there may be cases where the states may like to merge some employments
and simplify existing schedules. At the same time, the Commission is concerned
that there are no clear guidelines regarding the fixation of Minimum Wages
under the Minimum Wages Act, and this leads to considerable arbitrariness. It
has therefore been proposed that the State Boards being constituted can go into
these questions and can formulate appropriate guidelines for fixation of wages
under the Minimum Wages Act.[6]
Other Issues relating to
Wages
6.30
The Commission has analysed other aspects of payment of wages to
unorganised sector workers. There are cases of delayed payments both for wage
workers and home workers. We have, therefore, provided that the wages of
workers shall be paid for the periods agreed upon by the employer and the
worker which can in no case exceed one month. If there is any delay in payment
of wages beyond one month, then the employer shall be liable to pay penal
interest to the worker.[7]
The Commission is aware of the lack of voice of workers in this sector and
therefore the limitations in applicability of this suggestion. However a
beginning needs to be made in this direction.
6.31
Due to non availability of regular jobs the workers in the unorganised
sector do not have enough bargaining power vis
a vis the employers. The employers use all possible means and forms to
squeeze the quantum of wages paid to a worker under some pretext or other.
There are no rules to control or monitor the deductions from wages. The
deductions may be on account of advance to the worker, in the form of interest,
payments to contractors or agents, overvaluation of goods supplied or basic
amenities including accommodation in the case of seasonal migrant workers,
fines, inadequate or poor quality output. These kind of deductions are most rampant
in the case of seasonal migrant workers who take advances from their
employers/contractors, and in the case of home workers. The Commission
recommends that no deductions on these account be made, except in accordance
with rules made in this behalf by the State Government. This provision is
incorporated in the two Bills proposed by the Commission.[8]
6.32
The Minimum Wage Act provides for equivalence of wages between the time
rated minimum wages and the piece rated wages.
Where the wages of a wage worker or home worker are determined by a
piece rate system, the earnings of a worker working for 8 hours on piece rate
system under normal work intensity, should be at least equal to the time rated
minimum wages fixed for that category of work in the state concerned.[9]
Thus this would bring parity between the time rated wage worker and a piece
rated wage worker. There may be certain employments where Minimum wages have
not been fixed under the Minimum Wages Act. In such cases the comparison and
parity of piece rated work should be with the National Minimum Wage.
Women Workers
6.33
We have shown that women workers in the unorganised sector, suffer from
a number of handicaps. The Equal Remuneration Act applies to the unorganised
sector and has the object of ensuring that men and women receive equal
remuneration for equal work. However, one of the reasons that this does not
happen is that men and women are often segmented in different activities and
activities in which women predominate are valued poorly, even in cases where
work may be arduous or may require high skills. This Commission recommends that
an Employment Certification Committee be formed which will periodically
evaluate employments in the state and bring on par with the wages in
employments performed predominantly by women with employments certified as
equivalent in value. This is in order to bring the wages of women on par with
equivalent employment elsewhere. Employment Certification Committee to The
National Commission for Self-employed Women Workers had also made a similar
recommendation.[10]
6.34
Further, to facilitate the working of the women workers the Commission
is of the view that there should be adequate child care facility for which the
State Board for Promotion of Livelihood of Unorganised Sector Workers shall
make rules to be made available at local levels.
6.35
One of the issues with respect to women workers is that they are
vulnerable to sexual harassment. It is fundamentally the responsibility of
employers to ensure that women workers are treated with dignity and that this
does not happen.[11] However,
the Commission also recommends the creation of a Complaints Committee at the
district level and sub-district level, within the structure of the Dispute
Resolution Council and the Conciliation Committees to deal with complaints
concerning sexual harassment of women at the workplace. This is in line with
the Supreme Court Judgement in the Vishaka and Others vs. State of
Rajasthan and others case.[12]
Home workers
6.36
We have shown that homeworkers constitute an important segment of
self-employed home-based workers, especially among women workers. The
conditions of work of such workers are less amenable to regulation because
their relationship to their employers is indirect. Employers sometimes choose
to outsource work to homeworkers precisely for this reason. It is thus
extremely vital that the condition of work of the homeworkers is brought under
the ambit of regulation, even after recognising the difficulties inherent in
this task.
6.37
We have already discussed four issues relating to delayed payments,
deductions in payments, non-equivalence of piece rates and time rates, and the
valuation of work which affects home workers.
6.38
The homeworkers generally provide for her tool, equipment or uses part
of her own dwelling for the work purposes for which she/he gets no separate
compensation. In effect, the wage paid to the home worker is less as compared
to his counterparts who do the same work at the employers’ premises with the
aid of tool, equipment and place of work provided by the employer. Thus, for
equity the Commission feels that they should be separately compensated at such
percentages as may be decided by the State Government.[13]
6.39
It should be noted that the conditions of work of the homeworkers are
inseparable from their conditions of living. This calls for a role for
promotional policy which can assist such workers both by providing them with
work sheds and common facilities, but also in making provision for better
housing and basic facilities.
Migrant Workers
6.40Migrant workers, especially seasonal
migrants, suffer from a number of handicaps, including very poor working and
living conditions. In mines, quarries, brick kilns etc. where the system of
contractor based recruitments is predominant, these workers are recruited
against advances, and adjustments are made against their wages, which often
include contractor’s commission, overcharging for provisions and interest rate.
The Commission recommends that these adjustments be declared as illegal and be
made subject to the dispute resolution mechanism proposed in the Bills.[14]
6.41The migrant workers contribute
significantly to the rural and urban economies and still their various
vulnerabilities and deprivations are not factored in the planning process. The
Commission has proposed that promotional policies of the state ensure that
migrant workers receive their due entitlement and that their basic needs are
factored in the regional planning processes.
Disadvantaged workers
6.42
Workers belonging to the socially deprived groups and women usually form
the core of disadvantaged workers employed as bonded labour, child labour,
seasonal migrants, or suffering from various forms of social exclusion and
discrimination. The National Commission for Self-employed Women and Women
Workers in the Informal Sector and, more recently, the Prime Minister’s High
Level Committee on Muslim Minorities have recommended the constitution of an
Equal Opportunities Commission to deal with broader aspects of discrimination
and social exclusion (GOI 2006).
6.43
In the sphere of work, the Equal Remuneration Act protects workers
against discrimination in wage payments. The proposal made by the Commission on
the Certification Committee is aimed at protecting women workers against
subtler forms of wage discrimination linked to segmentation of labour markets.
The Commission has put discrimination on the basis of sex, caste, religion,
incidence of HIV-AIDS, migration status, and place of origin in employment,
wage rates and conditions of work within the purview of the proposed
legislations.[15]
6.44
With regard to child labourers,
the Commission has examined their position in the Report. Although the
percentage as child workers in the workforce appears to be declining, a large
number of children are still engaged in full time work as wage labourers. The
sectors in which children can be found to be working are both those sectors
where child labour is now prohibited as the work is deemed to be hazardous as
well as other sectors where child work is presently not prohibited. In the
Report, we have pointed out that as a result of increasing awareness and the
impact of promotional policies, mainly the expansion of elementary education,
child labour has declined in both prohibited and non-prohibited sectors.
However, new sources of the demand of child wage labour are also rising which
causes children from vulnerable households to be pushed into the labour force.
The Commission is of the view that there is considerable urgency to regulate
and check this trend. Further, we are of the view that instead of only relying
on Part II of the Child Labour
(Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986, suitable amendments should be made to
Part III of the Act (Regulation of Conditions of Work of Children), so that (i)
it would be punishable to employ any child under the age of 11 years; (ii) no
child between the age of 11 and up to 14 years can be employed in any
occupation during school sessions; and otherwise for more than 4 hours.
Availability of records
6.45The Commission has considered the
issue of record keeping as a method of verifying the terms and condition of
employment of the workers. A proportion of the small employers in the
unorganised non-agricultural sector and a sizeable proportion in the
agricultural sector are illiterate. Besides, the process of record keeping can be
quite cumbersome for such employers. At the same time, the Minimum Wage Acts
and the Shop and Establishment Acts already prescribe some record keeping. In
agriculture, however, many states provide exemptions to certain categories of
employers. The Commission is in favour of according some degree of formality to
the informal labour markets within pragmatic limits. We therefore recommend
that employers of regular workers in the non-agricultural workers be required
to provide, in writing, the terms and condition of employment to the workers.[16]
In all cases of non-agricultural employment, including in the case of casual
workers, wage slips may be provided.[17]
This is, however, not feasible in the agricultural sector, where we do
recommend that regular workers be provided a record of their terms and
conditions of employment. The Bills that the Commission has proposed put the
onus of proof on employers, and they might, therefore, keep such records as
might be necessary in verifying their claims of payment.[18]
Compensation in the case
of injury
6.46The wide variety of employment and
the various categories of work in the unorganised sector entails variety of
hazards and risks. The employer should provide the unorganised wage or
homeworker with adequate safety equipment while handling hazardous substances
and equipments.[19]
6.47Further if there is any accident or
occupational hazard arising out of or in the course of employment that results
in any temporary, permanent, partial or total disablement of the wage worker
the employer shall compensate the wage or home worker for it, which shall not
be lower than the benefits provided under the National Social Security Scheme,
being recommended by the Commission.[20]
The Commission further suggests that where the wage worker is covered under the
National Social Security Scheme, the employer shall not be pay such
compensation. This shall act as an incentive for the employers to get their
employees registered under the Scheme.
Implementation of Regulation of Conditions of Work and
Dispute Resolution
6.48Although the Commission has
recommended comprehensive legislation of regulation of conditions of work in
the unorganised agricultural and non-agricultural sectors, the factors which
will constrain the effectiveness with which the proposed legislations are
likely to be implemented will be similar to those which affect the functioning
of the existing laws.
6.49The large scale violation of the
existing laws such as the Minimum wage Acts is indicative of the lack of
knowledge on the part of the workers and the employers and the lack of
willingness on the part of the employers to enforce the existing regulations.
It is important that the government carries out a large scale education
programme aimed at the workers, the employers and other stake holders aimed at
inculcating the importance of assuring the workers a basic dignity and minimum
conditions of work. The National and State Boards proposed by the Commission
should also play a part in this campaign.
6.50
Another set of constraints on the implementation of laws for
the unorganised sector springs from the large and dispersed nature of such
employments, the limited outreach of the existing labour departments, the focus
of the conciliation machinery on the organised sector, and the lack of
infrastructure with the implementation departments. We propose that steps be
taken to improve the infrastructure of the department, focus on increasing its
efficiency and education and sensitisation programme of its officials.
6.51Perhaps the biggest constraint
arises from the lack of voice of the unorganised workers and their weak
bargaining power. These problems can only be corrected through concerted
efforts at strengthening the bargaining capacity of these workers. One of the
ways in which this can be done is by giving their representatives a
representation in dispute resolution mechanisms and by giving them the
authority to raise issues as disputes[21].
6.52The Commission has recommended the
constitution of Conciliation Committees and Dispute Resolution Councils for
both agricultural and non-agricultural workers respectively which are
tri-partite in character. In each of the Bills, the Commission has proposed
that the State Government will constitute Dispute Resolution Councils (DRC) at
district level and Conciliation Committees (CC) at an appropriate level below
the district level, i.e. Block/Tehsil/Mandal, level, for resolution of disputes
relating to the non observance of provisions of the Acts arising amongst the
unorganised wage workers/ home workers and employers.. The Composition of the
DRCs and CCs will be tri-partite in
character and will consist of representatives of employers, workers and an
Officer designated by the State Government to be the member secretary[22].
6.53The primary focus of the proposed
dispute resolution machinery will be on conciliation. The Conciliation
Committee shall, for the purpose of bringing about a settlement of the dispute,
without delay, investigate the dispute and all matters connected therewith or
require the matters to be investigated by the Labour Inspectors under this Act,
and may do all such things as they think fit for the purpose of inducing the
parties to come to a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute[23].
In case of failure of conciliation, the DRC shall record its finding and refer
the matter directly to an Adjudicator, within 4 weeks of the reference of the
dispute[24].
The proposal provides that the State Government shall also issue such
notifications and directions as are necessary to ensure that the adjudication
proceedings are concluded expeditiously with minimum loss of time and costs to
the parties involved.
6.54Where the dispute pertains to any
matter covered by any law mentioned in Section 4(1), the Dispute Resolution
Council shall forward the complaint to the appropriate authority created under
the relevant Act for adjudication.
7. Provisions for Social
Security
7.1
The Commission has examined the issue of social security for unorganised
workers in detail in its Report on
Social Security for Unorganised Workers, submitted to the government in May
2006. Tthe Commission had made a specific recommendation for An Act and a
National Social Security Scheme for which all unorganised workers could
register and be eligible to receive benefits. The Commission has recommended
that the Scheme cover all eligible unorganised workers within a period of five
years. These provisions are included in the present Bills in Chapter III of the
Comprehensive Bills (Section 7, Clause 1 and 3). The eligibility of the workers
under the scheme was to be determined subject to a ceiling on land held (two
hectares) in the case of agricultural workers, or income (Rs. 6500 per month,
as on 1.1. 2006, as discussed in the 40th Indian Labour Conference)
, in the case of non-agriultural workers (as per Section 20 of the Bills). The Commission’s approach has been to
ensure that a minimum level of social protection is seen by the workers as a
statutory right and an entitlement and not simply as an ad hoc largesse
bestowed by government.
7.2
The statutory National Social
Security Scheme which the Commission has proposed consists of a package of
the following minimum benefits[25]:
i.
Hospitalization benefit
for the worker and his family to the tune of Rs 15,000 per year, maternity
benefit to the extent of Rs 1000 to the worker/spouse, and sickness allowance
for 15 days beyond three days of hospitalization.
ii.
Life and disability insurance to the tune of Rs 30,000 in the
event of untimely natural death of the worker; Rs. 75,000 in the event of
accidental death or total disability; and Rs. 17,500 in the event of partial
disability.
iii.
Old age cover in the form
of a pension of Rs. 200 p.m. to all BPL workers above the age of 60 years, and
Provident Fund for all other registered workers.
7.3
It may be mentioned that the Commission has estimated the
total financial cost of the Scheme, at 2006-07 prices, on complete
implementation, to be about Rs 33.350 crores (Rs. 19.400 crores for
agricultural workers and Rs 12.950 crores for non-agricultural workers), as laid down in the Schedule to the Bills.
This includes The Commission has recommended a contributory scheme, in which the poor workers are exempt from
making any contribution, and other workers do not contribute more than
one-third. However, in the proposed Bills, the actual pattern of financing has
been left to the Central government, which can meet the financial expenditure
on the Scheme through grants and loans, contributions from employers and
workers, cess or tax (see Section 8 of the Bills).
Institutional Framework
7.4
The Commission had, in its Report
on Social Security for Unorganised Workers, proposed a federal structure
for implementation of the Scheme. The present Comprehensive Bills incorporate
this structure with few changes. The proposed structure is described in
Chapters 4 to 8 of the comprehensive Bills as well as in the Schedule to the
Bills. It is proposed that the National
Board for Social Security and Welfare will implement the scheme at the
Central level, while State Boards for
Social Security and Welfare will do the same at the State and District level[26].
Worker Facilitation Centres (WFCs)
which may be NGOs, trade unions, or PRIs will facilitate the scheme including
the registration of workers[27].
The actual registration of the workers as well as issue of identity cards will
be the responsibility of the State Boards. Further, in the Commission’s
proposal, there is possibility of incorporation of existing structures and
schemes at the State level as well as add-ons.
7.5
While the functions of the WFCs remain the same in this Report, we have
proposed a broadening of the functions of the National and State Boards in
relation to functions that we had proposed to these organisations in the 1996
Report. The functions of the National
Social Security and Welfare Board for Unorganised Workers will include
Social Security and Welfare functions, along with provisions for providing an
oversight for the provisions for the regulation of the conditions of work. The
Board, which is an apex institution will be common to both agricultural and
non-agricultural workers. The Commission has proposed that the National Board be constituted by the
Central Government and consist of stakeholders among trade unions, employers,
government bodies and public agencies, experts and other non-governmental
institutions dealing with the unorganised sector[28].
The exact constitution of the Boards is set out in the Bills proposed by the
Commission.
7.6
The Chairperson shall be a person of eminence
appointed by the government, and an officer in the rank of the Secretary to the
Government of India, shall be the full-time Member-Secretary, who shall be its
Chief executive Officer[29]. The National Board shall have a
secretariat with adequate professional and other staff. The staff of the National Board for promotion of livelihood of Unorganised Workers
(agricultural/non-agricultural) shall be governed by the Central Government
rules and regulations existing from time to time.
7.7
A National Social Security and
Welfare Fund would be created and would be operated by National Board (See
Section 8 of the Bills). The
contribution of the Central Government will be credited to the NSSF at the
beginning of each year[30]. Similarly, State Funds would be created
under the State Boards (whose functions are discussed below), to which state
level sources of finances for the National Social Security Scheme as well
as finances for other schemes would
accrue.
7.8
The National Board will perform the following pivotal functions for the
protection and promotion of the unorganised agricultural and non-agricultural
sectors[31]:
(i) Administration of this Act and formulation of
policies at the national level, and shall have such powers as may be laid down
to direct, co-ordinate, supervise, and monitor the functioning of State Boards
and the Central Welfare Boards;
(ii) Review the working including auditing of the
State Boards and the Central Welfare Boards every four years and make suitable
recommendations to the Government(s) concerned for further improvement;
(iii) Manage and maintain the National Social
Security and Welfare Fund, provide financial
assistance to State Boards; recommend new schemes and programmes and projects
for implementation through the Fund;
(iv) Advise the Central Government on policy matters
relating to social security, and
extension of schemes of social security such as ESI and EPF to unorganised
sector workers; and health, safety and
welfare of workers;
(v) Assist in capacity building of the State
Boards.
(vi) Collect, compile and publish statistics
relating to the unorganised sector and undertake such promotional activities as
may be decided from time to time.
(vii) Monitor and review the impact of
existing schemes, policies and programmes of various Ministries and Departments
of Government of India on the unorganised sector workers and make appropriate
recommendations;
(viii) Advise the Government regarding the
promotion of gainful employment opportunities and promotion of livelihood
options and matters relating to welfare of unorganised sector workers;
(ix) Identify skill and training requirements for
unorganized workers and to advise the government accordingly;
(x) Carry out periodic surveys on the condition of
work in the unorganised sector and make suitable recommendations to the
government;
(xi) Hold public hearings to entertain petitions
submitted by the unorganised sector workers and make appropriate
recommendations;
(xii) Advise government on special
protection measures for migrant workers and their families in providing the
ration cards, housing and education to their children;
(xiii) Provide for guidelines of periodic
review of the national minimum wages fixed by the Central Government after
taking into account the minimum basic needs of the wage workers and his/her
family.
7.9
In consonance with the federal character, we have proposed that State Boards for Social Security and
Welfare for Agricultural Workers and Non-Agricultural Workers be set up
under the provisions of the two Bills respectively . The organisational structure of the State Boards is similar to
the National Boards. The State Boards have, however, more direct
responsibilities with respect to the implementation of the National Social
Security Scheme. They can also frame their own schemes and undertake other
welfare and livelihood promotion activities. Besides, the State Boards will
also undertake specific oversight functions with respect to regulation of
conditions of work. For example, they will make guidelines for fixation of
minimum wages; determine the safety and health standards required to be
maintained in various occupations; carry out periodic surveys of occupational
health hazards; and constitute an Employment Certification Committee to bring
the wages in employments performed mainly by women on par with other
employments certified as equivalent in value .
7.10
Thus, it is envisaged that the National and State Boards will play a
pivotal role with respect to the National Social Security Scheme, in
progressively enhancing the scope of social security and welfare measures for
unorganised sector workers, in monitoring the conditions of work in the sector
and regulating these conditions; and in undertaking promotional measures to
enhance employability and employment of the unorganised sector workers.
8.1
The purpose of this Report has been to present a rationale as well as a
proposal for comprehensive protective legislations for agricultural workers and
the unorganised non-agricultural workers respectively. These legislations
include provisions for regulating minimum conditions of work, social security,
welfare, and livelihood promotion and are appended to this report. The
Recommendations of the Commission with respect to conditions of work is
discussed in this Report while its recommendations on Social Security have been
submitted earlier to government. The Commission’s recommendations on livelihood
promotion will be submitted shortly as part of its detailed Report on Conditions of Work and
Promotion of Livelihoods in the
Unorganised Sector..
8.2
We have noted that although there are existing laws which provide some
provision for conditions of work to certain sections of wage workers, and there
are also some initiatives by the corporate sector to provide for minimum
conditions of work through voluntary codes, there is no comprehensive framework
which provides for basic and minimum conditions of work for wage workers and
home workers. The laws that exist are also poorly implemented because of the
inadequacies of the implementation machinery and the lack of voice among
unorganised workers.
8.3
The Commission has therefore suggested a comprehensive regulatory
framework to prescribe minimum conditions of work for all unorganised workers.
Given some differences between agricultural and non-agricultural workers in the
conditions of work, two separate Bills have been proposed. Instead of relying
on bureaucratic implementation and costly and time consuming legal redressal
procedures, the Commission has accorded priority to conciliation and has
proposed the participation of workers’ representatives and elected
representatives of the local bodies in the conciliation and dispute resolution
committees. Further, if adjudication is required, the Commission has emphasised
expeditiousness and the Bill requires that the State government prescribes
modalities by which this might be ensured.
8.4
The Commission had earlier proposed a stand-alone social security
legislation along with its comprehensive Report
on Social Security for Unorganised Workers. During its consultations on
working conditions and livelihood promotion, the Commission has been apprised
that tri-partite consultations held under the auspices of the Ministry of
Labour have advocated two comprehensive legislations in which the provisions
for social security are incorporated along with the provisions for regulation
of conditions of work and livelihood promotion. The Commission has considered
these views carefully. It has also considered the fact that its recommendations
on social security are already under consideration of government. While it is
still of the opinion that its social security proposals are fully viable on a
stand-alone basis, it has taken the view that incorporation of its existing
recommendations on social security along with its current recommendations on
regulation of minimum conditions of work and livelihood promotion in the two
comprehensive Bills (for agricultural and non-agricultural workers
respectively) may be helpful in building a broader consensus around these
important issues. It has accordingly recommended two comprehensive Bills for
agricultural and unorganised non-agricultural workers respectively, covering
working conditions, welfare and livelihood promotion, and (its earlier
recommendations on) social security.
8.5
In view of the fact, that a primary problem relating to the poor living
and working conditions of both the self-employed and the wage employed lies in
the low productivity of the unorganised enterprises, the Commission’s view is
that protection and promotion of livelihoods is also an integral part of any
strategy which aims at improving the condition of unorganised sector workers. Further,
although, while a number of promotion initiatives for the unorganised sector
are available no single agency provides an overview of the problems and
constraints facing this sector or is able to mobilise the necessary resources
to help the sector overcome such constraints and facilitate its growth. The
Commission, is therefore of the view that the appropriate governments take a
number of necessary steps to protect and promote these livelihoods through
appropriate policies and programmes. It is separately recommending the creation
of a National Fund which can play a catalytic role in the promotion of
livelihoods of the unorganised sector workers. It has also prepared an Action Programme which, apart from the
two dimensions which are detailed here (social protection and regulation of
conditions of work), includes a number of measures which, in the Commission’s
view, are required to be undertaken on a priority basis to expand employment
and improve livelihoods and incomes of unorganised sector workers.
AGRICULTURAL WORKERS’ CONDITIONS OF WORK AND SOCIAL SECURITY
BILL, 2007.
PRELIMINARY
1.
Short title, extent, commencement and application
2.
Definitions
3.
Rules of evidence
Chapter
II
CONDITIONS OF WORK TO BE
ENSURED FOR THE WAGE WORKER
4.
Physical Conditions of work
5.
Duration of work
6.
Conditions of work and payment of wages
Chapter
III
SOCIAL
SECURITY BENEFITS
7.
Framing of schemes
NATIONAL
SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE FUND FOR UNORGANISED WORKERS
8.
Constitution of a National Fund
9.
Existing Welfare Boards
10.
Exemption from Income Tax
11.
Utilisation of the National Fund
NATIONAL
SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE BOARD FOR UNORGANISED WORKERS
12.
Establishment and incorporation
13.
Functions of the Board
14.
Composition of the Board
15.
Secretariat of the Board
Chapter
VI
STATE SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE BOARDS FOR
AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
16. Establishment
of State Boards
17. State
Fund
18. Functions
19. Secretariat
of the Board
REGISTRATION
OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
20. Eligibility
for registration and for social security benefits
21. Unique
Identification Social Security Number
22. Identity card
23. Portability
of registration
24. Cessation
of registration
25. Membership of Existing
Welfare Boards
Chapter
VIII
DELIVERY
OF SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
26. Implementation machinery
27. Workers’
Facilitation Centres
28. Premium
and compensation/benefits
Chapter
IX
ENFORCEMENT
AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION BODIES
29. Disputes Resolution
Council and Conciliation Committees
30. Functions and powers of
the Conciliation Committee and Dispute Resolution Council
31. Adjudication and
constitution of Agricultural Tribunals
32. Contravention of
provisions regarding employment of agricultural workers
Chapter X
MISCELLANEOUS
33. Accounts and audit
34. Power to make rules
35. Savings
36. Effect
of laws and agreements inconsistent with this Act
The agricultural sector of the
economy in India is the largest sector in terms of employment of the
workforce. It consists of crop
cultivation and other agricultural activities such as forestry, livestock and
fishing. The workers in this sector may
be broadly divided into wage workers, and farmers. Almost the entire agricultural sector (except the Plantation
Sector) is unorganized i.e. it has neither any formal system of social security
nor regulation of conditions of work. Hence, this Bill is intended to cover all
unorganised agricultural workers, who are all agricultural wage workers not
protected under the Plantations Workers Act, and marginal and small farmers.
This Bill is intended to regulate the minimum conditions of work to
agricultural wage workers and provide a measure of social security to
agricultural wage workers and marginal and small farmers in the unorganised
sector. The Bill mandates the Central
and State governments to implement a package of National Minimum Social
Security Scheme for which all agricultural workers would be entitled. This Bill
is also intended to provide minimum conditions of work for agricultural wage
workers whose minimum conditions of work are not regulated by any other
legislation. It also provides a mechanism for dispute resolution for such
workers.
AGRICULTURAL
WORKERS’ CONDITIONS OF WORK AND SOCIAL SECURITY BILL, 2007.
A
BILL
to provide
for regulation of conditions of work, social security and welfare, and a
dispute resolution mechanism for Agricultural workers and to provide for other
matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.
BE it
enacted by Parliament in the fifty-eighth year of the Republic of India as
follows:-
PRELIMINARY
1. Short
title, extent, commencement and application
(1) This Act may be called
Agricultural Workers’ Conditions of Work and Social Security Act, 2007.
(2) It extends to the whole of
India.
(3) It shall come into force on such
date as the Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint,
and different dates may be appointed for different States and different areas
in a State and for different provisions of this Act, within six months from the
date of the assent.
2. Definitions
For the purposes of this Act, unless
the context otherwise requires, -
a)
“Adolescent” means a person of the age
of 14 years and above and who has not completed 18 years of age.
b)
“Agricultural worker” means either a farmer (as
defined in clause g below) or a wage worker engaged in agriculture.
Explanation: Workers eligible for protection under
the Plantation Workers Act are excluded from the purview of this Act.
c)
"Agriculture"
means
the following occupations:
(i) Farming, including the cultivation and tillage of soil, etc;
(ii) Dairy farming;
(iii) Production,
cultivation, growing and harvesting of any horticultural commodity;
(iv) Raising of
livestock, bee-keeping or poultry;
(v) Fishing and/ or fish
farming or sericulture;
(vi) Any practice
performed on a farm as incidental to, or in conjunction with, the farm
operations (including any forestry or timbering operations and the preparation
for market and delivery to storage or to market or to carriage for transportation
of farm products);
(vii) Growing fodder or
thatching grass or for grazing cattle.
d)
“Casual worker” means a wage worker engaged in agriculture in
consideration of wages, whose employment is of casual nature.
e)
"Child" means a person who has
not completed 14 years of age.
f)
“Employer” means a natural or juridical
person, or an association of such persons, by whom any agricultural worker is engaged or employed either directly or
otherwise, in consideration of wages.
g)
“Farmer” means any person engaged
in agricultural activities, either individually or with one or more persons,
and not owning or operating a holding of more than two hectares or such limits
as may be notified from time to time by the State government.
h)
"Government" means either Central
Government, or State Government, or Union Territory administration, or local
government, or Cantonment Boards as the case may be.
i)
"Home worker" means an unorganised
non-agricultural sector worker
involved in the production of goods or services as specified by an
employer, in his / her own home or other premises of his / her choice (other
than the work place of the employer) for remuneration, irrespective of whether
or not the employer provides the equipment, materials or other inputs.
j)
“Identity card” means a card issued to
an agricultural worker carrying a unique number issued by the authorised agency
of the State Board.
k)
“Migrant worker” includes inter state and
intra state migrant workers.
l)
“National Board” means the National
Social Security and Welfare Board for unorganised workers.
m)
“Non-agriculture” means all occupations
other than those included in agriculture and includes occupations related to
Mining and Quarrying, Manufacturing, Electricity, Gas and water supply and
Construction sectors, and services (including trade; hotels; restaurants;
transport, storage and communications; financing, insurance, real estate and
business services; and community, social and personal services).
n)
“Registered Agricultural Worker” means an agricultural worker registered for
benefits under this Act.
o)
“Remuneration” means as defined in the
Equal Remuneration Act, 1976.
p)
“Sexual Harassment” is such unwelcome
sexually determined behavior such as physical contact, advances, sexually
coloured remarks, showing pornography or making sexual demands, whether verbal,
textual, graphic or electronic or by any other actions, which may -.
(i)
contain implied or overt promise of preferential treatment in that wage
worker’s employment; or
(ii)
contain an implied or overt threat of detrimental treatment in that wage
worker’s employment or an implied or overt threat about the present or future
employment status of that wage worker and includes the creation of a hostile
working environment; or
(iii)
interfere with a wage worker’s work or create an intimidating, hostile or
offensive work environment; or
(iv)
be humiliating and may constitute a health and safety problem.
Explanation1: Hostile Environment: A
work environment is “hostile” when unwelcome verbal, non-verbal or physical
behaviour focusing on sexuality is severe and pervasive enough to interfere
with the victim’s work performance or be intimidating or offensive to a
reasonable person.
q)
“State Board” means the (name of the
State) State Social Security and Welfare Board for agricultural workers.
r)
"Self employed
non-agricultural worker” means any person who operates a non-farm enterprise or
engages in a non-agricultural profession, trade or business, either on own
account individually or with one or more persons.
s)
“Unorganised
non-agricultural sector” consists of all unincorporated private non-agricultural
enterprises owned by individuals or households engaged in the production and
sale of non-agricultural goods and services and operated on a proprietary or a
partnership basis and employing less than ten persons.
t)
Unorganised
non-agricultural sector worker” means a self employed non-agricultural worker, a home
worker or a wage worker employed or engaged in the unorganised non-agricultural
sector.
u)
““Unorganised
non-agricultural worker” means an unorganised non-agricultural sector worker and
also includes workers in the organized non-agricultural sector not protected by
the existing laws relating to conditions of work and/or social security.
v)
“Unorganised Worker” means unorganised
non-agricultural worker, and agricultural worker (except those eligible for
protection under the Plantation Workers Act).
w)
“Wages” means as defined in clause (vi) of section 2 of the
Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (4 of 1936).
x)
“Wage worker” means a person employed
in agriculture for a remuneration directly by an employer or through any agency
or contractor, whether exclusively for one employer or for one or more
employers, whether simultaneously or otherwise, whether in cash and/or in kind
whether as a temporary or casual worker, or as a migrant worker.
3. Rules of
evidence
In this Act, notwithstanding
anything contained in the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, the burden of proof that
compliance with the provisions of the Act and the Scheme has been effected
shall be entirely on the employer and the units of the Board, wherever
applicable.
[Explanatory Note: This section
facilitates shifting the burden of proof from the workers to the employer. This
is a departure from the normal practice and ordinary rules of evidence, which
places the burden on the plaintiff.]
Chapter II
CONDITIONS
OF WORK TO BE ENSURED FOR THE WAGE WORKER
4. Physical
Conditions of work
(1) Every employer shall
provide in all the lands where agricultural work is carried on such basic
amenities and first-aid facilities, and reasonable housing and provision
of basic amenities for seasonal migrant workers, as may be prescribed.
(2) Every employer shall ensure that
personal protective safety equipments are provided to such agricultural workers
as are required to handle machinery and agro-chemicals as are hazardous to the
life and limb of such workers. The State Board shall carry out periodic studies
on occupational hazards arising in this sector and develop suitable
outreach/extension programmes for this purpose.
(3) Every employer shall compensate
a wage worker for any accident or occupational hazard arising out of or in the
course of employment that results in any temporary, permanent, partial or total
disablement of the wage worker, at rates to be specified in this behalf.
(4) The employer shall ensure that
there is no sexual harassment of the agricultural wage worker at the place of
work. The state government shall make appropriate rules concerning the
disciplinary action that may be taken by an employer where a complaint of
sexual harassment is established against a wage worker; and the compensation
payable by an employer where a case of sexual harassment is established against
the employer himself/herself.
(5) The State Board shall make rules
with respect to child care facilities to be made available at local levels.
5. Duration
of work
(1) The normal hours of work
of a agricultural wage worker shall be limited to eight hours a day beyond
which a worker shall be paid overtime at one and a half the normal rate of
wages per hour.
Provided that nothing contained in
this section shall be deemed to prohibit an agreement between the employer and
the wage workers engaged in agriculture for working for less than eight hours
on any particular day or days or on all days of employment or to affect any
custom or practice prevailing in the locality under which the wage worker
engaged in agriculture is required to work for less than eight hours.
Explanation: Nothing contained in
this section shall extend the normal hours of work beyond eight hours to give
effect to any custom or practice prevailing in the locality.
(2) Every eight hour working day of
the agricultural wage worker shall have at least an half hour break, so however
that the spread over of work shall not exceed ten hours.
(3)
Women and adolescents shall not be employed as agricultural wage workers
between the hours of 9 p.m. and 5 a.m., except where permitted under rules made
in this behalf.
(4) Every agricultural wage worker
shall be entitled to one paid day of rest after completing six continuous days
of employment by or under a single employer.
6.
Conditions of work and payment of wages
(1) No employer shall employ any
agricultural wage worker, in contravention of the existing Acts which are
applicable to the worker. In particular, the employer shall comply with the
following Acts:
a)
Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act, 1976;
b)
Child Labour (Prohibition and Regulation) Act, 1986;
c)
Minimum Wages Act, 1948; and
d)
Equal Remuneration Act, 1976
(2) (a) The Central government shall
notify a National Minimum Wage.
(b) The National Minimum Wage shall
apply to all agricultural wage workers in employments not notified under the
Minimum Wages Act.
Provided that where the wage under
the Minimum Wages Act is lower than the National Minimum Wage, the concerned
State Government shall amend the prescribed Minimum Wage to bring it in
conformity with the National Minimum Wage.
Provided further that till such time
as this is done, the wage worker shall be entitled to receive the National
Minimum Wage.
(c) The Central Government shall fix
a National Minimum Wage for all employments, after taking into account the
minimum basic needs of the wage and home workers and his/her family, variations
in the cost of living in different areas and other parameters on the basis of
consultation with a tripartite body consisting of workers, employers and the
Government representatives.
(d) The National Minimum
Wage shall be announced by the Central Government within one year of the
implementation of this Act and shall be periodically reviewed through a
modality prescribed by the National Board.
Provided that, till the
announcement of the National Minimum Wage as above, the national floor level
minimum wage recommended by the Ministry of Labour for 2004-05, shall, after
adjusting for cost of living changes in different areas, be treated as the
National Minimum Wage.
(3) Where the wages are determined
by a piece rate system, the earnings of an agricultural worker working for 8
hours should be at least equal to the time rated minimum wages fixed for that
category of work in the state concerned, and where the rates have not been
fixed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 in the relevant state, the rates as
fixed under clause (2) above.
(4) Wages in employments performed
predominantly by women shall be brought on par with employments certified as
equivalent in value by an Employment Certification Committee to be constituted
by the State Board. The Employment Certification Committee shall periodically
evaluate employments in the state for this purpose.
(5) Wages of agricultural workers
shall be duly paid for the periods agreed upon. The wage period can on no
account exceed one month; any delay in payment beyond this periods will require
the employer to pay penal rates of interest, as specified in this behalf, for
the period of the delay to the agricultural wage worker.
(6) There shall be no deduction from
wages, including in such cases where such wages are paid as advance to the
worker, in the form of interest, payments to contractors or agents,
overvaluation of goods supplied or basic amenities provided including
accommodation in the case of seasonal migrant workers, fines, inadequate or
poor quality output, except in accordance with rules made in this behalf by the
State Government.
(7)(a) Every employer shall provide
an agricultural wage worker the details of remuneration received by him/her in
such form as may be prescribed by the State Government.
(b) Every agricultural wage worker,
except casual workers, shall receive a letter of employment from his/her
employer, stating the terms of employment of his/her employment.
(c)
Every employer shall maintain such registers and records as may be
necessary to verify the employer’s claim regarding the employment status of
agricultural wage workers and details of payments made to them.
(8) All agricultural workers shall
have the right to organise, by forming trade unions or other membership based
organisations, for representation and collective bargaining in various
fora. (Note: This applies to both wage workers and farmers)
(9) No employer shall discriminate
against any agricultural wage worker on
the grounds of sex, caste, religion, incidence of HIV-AIDS, migration status,
place of origin, in employment, wage rates and conditions of work as laid down
in this Act.
SOCIAL
SECURITY BENEFITS
7. Framing of Schemes
(1) The Central Government shall
formulate and notify in the Official Gazette a National Social Security Scheme
containing such basic features as provided for in the Schedule to this Act.
(2) The National Social Security
Scheme for the agricultural workers shall consist of a package of the following
national minimum social security benefits:
(i) Health benefits for self, spouse
and children below the age of 18 years, and maternity benefits for women
workers or spouse of men workers;
(ii) Life and disability cover for
natural or accidental death of the worker;
(iii) Old age security in the form
of old age pension for workers above the age of 60 years or Provident Fund.
(3) The Scheme will be applicable to
all eligible workers within a period of five years.
(4) In addition to the national
minimum, the Central Government may frame on recommendations of the National
Board such schemes as it may deem necessary or finance such schemes of the
State governments/Welfare Boards as it may find appropriate, subject to
availability of finance by such means as mentioned in Section 8 and may include
those listed under (5) below.
(5) The State Government on
recommendations of the State Board may formulate schemes for such unorganised
workers as it may find appropriate to: (a) strengthen the national minimum
social security by way of its own contribution, and/or (b) design and implement
additional social security benefits through its own schemes. These may include:
a)
Provident Fund schemes;
b)
Employment injury benefit
scheme;
c)
Housing schemes;
d)
Educational schemes for children of workers;
e)
Skill up-gradation;
f)
Funeral assistance;
g)
Marriage of daughters; and
h)
Any other schemes to enhance socio-economic security.
(6) The Central Government shall
have the power to remove difficulties that arise in giving effect to the
provisions of the Scheme by an order published in the Official Gazette, not
inconsistent with the provisions of the Act, as appears to it necessary or
expedient for the removal of the difficulty.
NATIONAL
SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE FUND FOR UNORGANISED WORKERS
8. Constitution of a National Fund
The Central Government shall create a National Social Security and
Welfare Fund to which contributions shall accrue from the following sources:
a)
Grants and loans from the Central Government;
b)
Contributions from workers, employers and Governments in the form and
manner to be prescribed in the specified National Minimum Social Security
Scheme, provided that the Central government may exempt any class of
unorganised workers or employers from making their contribution under such
conditions as may be specified;
c)
Any tax or cess that the Central Government may impose for the purpose
of providing social security for unorganized
workers;
d)
Any tax or cess that the Central Government may impose on commodities
and/or services in lieu of employers’ contributions (which are either difficult
to collect or appropriate employers in the unorganised sector are not directly
identifiable).
In addition to the above,
contributions may also accrue from the following sources:
e)
Contributions from the national financial/developmental institutions;
and
f)
Any voluntary contribution from individuals or institutions.
9. Existing
Welfare Boards
Notwithstanding any other provision
contained under any other law, the Appropriate Government may merge any
existing Welfare Board/Boards and Welfare Fund/Funds constituted under any
other law into the Board and Fund created under this Act.
All financial contributions made by
individuals and institutions to the National Social Security and Welfare Fund
will be exempted from the payment of income tax under the Income Tax Act.
11. Utilisation of the
National Fund
b)
Grants to the State Boards, including for the purposes of the
functioning of the Workers’ Facilitation Centres;
c)
Expenses on the administration of the scheme;
d)
Investment in permitted schemes;
e)
Any other item in connection with the administration of this Act.
NATIONAL
SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE BOARD FOR UNORGANISED WORKERS
With effect from such date as the
Central Government may, by notification appoint, there shall be established for
the purposes of this Act, a Board to be called the National Social Security and
Welfare Board for Unorganised Workers.
a)
Administration of this Act and
formulation of policies at the national level, and shall have such powers as
may be laid down to direct, co-ordinate, supervise, and monitor the functioning
of State Boards and the Central Welfare Boards;
b)
Review the working including
auditing of the State Boards and the Central Welfare Boards every four years
and make suitable recommendations to the Government(s) concerned for further
improvement;
c)
Manage and maintain the National
Social Security and Welfare Fund,
provide financial assistance to State Boards; recommend new schemes and
programmes and projects for implementation through the Fund;
d)
Advise the Central Government on
policy matters relating to social security, and extension of schemes of social
security such as ESI and EPF to unorganised sector workers; and health, safety and welfare of workers;
e)
Assist in capacity building of
the State Boards;
f)
Collect, compile and publish statistics relating to the unorganised
sector and undertake such promotional activities as may be decided from time to
time;
g)
Monitor and review the impact of existing schemes, policies and
programmes of various Ministries and Departments of Government of India on the
unorganised sector workers and make appropriate recommendations;
h)
Advise the Government regarding the promotion of gainful employment
opportunities and promotion of livelihood options and matters relating to
welfare of unorganised sector workers;
i)
Identify skill and training requirements for unorganised workers and to
advise the government accordingly;
j)
Carry out periodic surveys on the condition of work in the unorganised
sector and make suitable recommendations to the government;
k)
Hold public hearings to entertain petitions submitted by the unorganized
sector workers and make appropriate recommendations;
l)
Advise government on special protection measures for migrant workers and
their families in providing the ration cards, housing and education to their
children; and
m)
Provide for guidelines of periodic review of the national minimum wages
fixed by the Central Government after taking into account the minimum basic
needs of the wage workers and his/her family.
(1)
The National Welfare Board for unorganised workers shall be constituted by the
Central Government consisting of the following member organisations:
a)
Central Trade Unions and Agricultural Worker Unions; National level
organizations, including federation of such organizations, of unorganised sector workers including the
self-employed;
b)
National Level organisations of employers of unorganised sector workers;
c)
Central Government Ministries, State Boards, Central Welfare Boards and
Public Agencies; and
d)
Experts in the area of management of insurance products and services;
social security and related issues in the unorganized sector; management of
finances, and other organizations and stakeholders working with the unorganized
sector.
(2) The Central
Government shall decide the criteria, number and names of such organisations to
be represented on the National Board, with adequate representation of wage
workers, self employed workers and women representing the workers.
(3) The National Board shall work through a Secretariat.
(4) The Chairman of the National
Board shall be nominated by the Central Government from amongst persons of
eminence in the fields of labour welfare, management, finance, law and
administration. The Member Secretary, who shall be the chief
executive officer shall be designated by the Central Government being a person
not below the rank of Secretary to the Government of India.
(5) The Board shall meet as often as
possible but not less than twice a year.
The National Board shall have a
secretariat with adequate professional and other staff. The staff of the National Board shall be
governed by the Central Government rules and regulations existing from time to
time. The annual budget of the National Board shall be prepared by the
Secretariat and placed before the full Board for approval.
Chapter VI
STATE
SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE BOARDS FOR AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
a)
Trade Unions and Agricultural Worker Unions; State level organizations,
including federation of such organizations of unorganised agricultural sector
workers including the farmers;
b)
State Level organisations of employers of unorganised agricultural
sector workers;
c)
State Government Ministries, Welfare Boards and Public Agencies; and
d)
Experts in the area of management of insurance products and services;
social security and related issues in the unorganized agricultural sector;
management of finances, and other organizations and stakeholders working with
the unorganized agricultural sector.
(2) The State Government
shall decide the criteria, number and names of such organisations to be
represented on the State Board, with adequate representation of wage workers,
farmers and women representing the workers.
(3) The State Board shall work through a Secretariat.
(4) The Chairman of the
State Board shall be nominated by the State Government from amongst persons of
eminence in the fields of labour welfare, management, finance, law and
administration. The Member Secretary, who shall be the chief
executive officer shall be designated by the State Government being a person
not below the rank of Secretary to the Government of the State.
(5) The Board shall meet as often as
possible but not less than twice a year.
17. State Fund
(1) The State government shall
create a State Social Security and welfare Fund to which contributions shall
accrue from the following sources:
(i) Grants and loans from National Board and
the State government;
(ii) Any tax or cess that the State
government may impose on commodities and/or services in lieu of employers’
contributions (which are either difficult to collect or appropriate employers
in the unorganised Sector are not directly identifiable);
(iii) Contribution toward
additional social security scheme (if any) formulated by the State Board;
(iv)
Contributions from the national financial/developmental institutions;
and
(v) Any voluntary
contribution from individuals or institutions.
(2) All financial contributions made
by individuals and institutions to the State Social Security and welfare Fund will be exempted from the payment of
income tax under the Income Tax Act.
(3) All
contributions accruing to the State Boards shall be credited to the State
Social Security and Welfare Fund which shall be applied for meeting the
following:
a)
Expenses on the implementation of the national minimum social security
and additional social security schemes of the State Government;
b)
Grants to the Welfare Boards and the Workers’ Facilitation Centres;
c)
Expenses on the administration of the State Board as per the annual
budget approved by the Executive Council;
d)
Investment in permitted schemes; and
e)
Any other item in connection with the administration of this Act.
The State Boards will perform the
following functions:
a)
Administer this Act at the State level including ensuring collection of
contributions, maintenance of individual accounts of the registered
agricultural workers and records of receipt of contribution from individual
employers;
b)
Implement the national minimum
social security for agricultural workers through appropriate organisational
arrangements, negotiate with the providers for the best possible offers,
and stipulate norms for the evaluation
of the work done by the Workers’ Facilitation Centres;
c)
Frame guidelines to ensure
portability of benefits to workers;
d)
Frame and implement social
security schemes, in addition to the National Social Security Scheme, that the
State Board may design in consultation with the State government;
e)
Provide financial assistance to
other member organisations implementing social security programmes;
f)
Advise the State government on
policy matters relating to social security, health and safety and welfare of
agricultural workers;
g)
Create awareness among the
agricultural workers about the need for social security registration and the
existence of various social security schemes;
h)
Collect, compile and publish
statistics, with the help of statistical organisations, regarding agricultural
workers and their conditions of work, and employers who engage these workers at
the Panchayat/Municipal, District, State levels with such details as
gender and age, nature of occupation, level of earnings, etc.;
i)
Review the working of the
Welfare Boards and other implementing agencies on the basis of annual reports
and statements of audited accounts or specially commissioned reports and make
suitable recommendations to the government(s) concerned for further
improvement;
j)
Assist in capacity building of
Workers Welfare Boards and Workers’ Facilitation Centres;
k)
Initiate innovative approaches,
through interaction across sectors and constituencies, for the enhancement of
welfare, working conditions and productivity of agricultural workers;
l)
Submit annual report to the National Board within four months from the
last day of the previous financial year along with an audited statement of
accounts;
m)
Monitor and review the impact of existing schemes, policies and
programmes of various Ministries and Departments of the concerned State
Government on agricultural workers and make appropriate recommendations;
n)
Advise the Government regarding the promotion of gainful employment
opportunities and promotion of livelihood options for agricultural workers;
o)
Encourage the promotion of labour organizations and cooperatives to
secure gainful employment and dignified conditions of work;
p)
Identify skill and training requirements for agricultural workers and to
advise the government accordingly;
q)
Carry out periodic surveys on the condition of work in the agricultural
sector and make suitable recommendations to the government;
r)
Hold public hearings to entertain petitions submitted by agricultural
workers and make appropriate recommendations;
s)
Carry out surveys to determine the safety and health standards required
in the agricultural sector, and publish manuals and outreach programmes for
worker safety;
t)
Review the Minimum Wages for the state after taking into account the
cost of living and minimum basic needs of the agricultural wage workers and
his/her family;
u)
Constitute Employment Certification Committee to bring the wages in
employments performed predominantly by women on par with employments certified
as equivalent in value and periodically evaluate employments in the state for
this purpose; and
v)
Carry out periodic studies on occupational hazards arising in this
sector and develop suitable outreach/extension programmes for this purpose;
19. Secretariat of the Board
The State Board shall have a
secretariat with adequate professional and other staff. The staff of the State Board shall be
governed by the State government rules and regulations existing from time to
time.
REGISTRATION
OF AGRICULTURAL WORKERS
20. Eligibility for
registration and for social security benefits
Every agricultural worker shall be
eligible for registration subject to the following conditions:
a)
He/she should have completed 18 years of age;
b)
His monthly income does not exceed Rs.7000/- in 2007 (roughly equivalent
to Rs. 6500/- per month recommended by the Indian Labour Conference held in
December 2005); and
c)
a self-declaration confirming that he/she is an agricultural worker not
owning or operating a holding of more than two hectares or such limits as may
be notified from time to time by the State
government; .
Each registered agricultural worker
shall be eligible for receiving a Unique Identification Social Security Number
in the form of an Identity Card issued in the name of the State Board.
22.
Identity card
The State Government shall decide
the manner of registration of unorganized agricultural sector workers, issuance
of identity cards and manner of record keeping at the district level.
The Identity Card issued to
agricultural workers shall remain valid even in the case of migration to
another district in the country and the new address can be changed on
application to the authority concerned.
24. Cessation of registration
The National Board shall draw up
rules to decide on the period of validity of registration, renewals, cessation
of registration and settlement of claims on the death of the card holder.
25.
Membership of Existing Welfare Boards
In case, any agricultural worker is
eligible for benefit under one or more existing Central or Welfare Boards, in
addition to his eligibility for the National Minimum Social Security Scheme,
(1) The agricultural worker
shall retain the option of membership of the Fund with the highest benefit.
(2) The National/State Board
may decide the criteria on which the agricultural worker can be eligible for
benefit under the National Minimum Social Security Scheme in addition to
membership in other Boards/schemes.
Chapter
VIII
DELIVERY OF
SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
26.
Implementation Machinery
The
State Boards shall be responsible for the delivery of mandatory minimum social
security benefits and shall decide the manner in which social security benefits
shall have to be delivered to the registered agricultural workers. This may
include tie-ups with local organisations like banks, post offices and insurance
companies.
27. Workers’ Facilitation
Centres
(1) In order to extend coverage and reach the agricultural
workers in remote areas, the State Boards may designate any one or more of the
following at the local level as Workers’ Facilitation Centres (WFC):
a)
Existing Worker Welfare Boards and their local offices;
b) Local
Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRI);
c)
Organisations of workers including trade unions, associations and
co-operatives in the agricultural sector;
d)
Self-help Groups (SHGs); and
e)
Non-profit organisations working among the agricultural sector workers.
(2) Such designated Workers’ Facilitation Centres shall perform
the following functions:
a)
Disseminate information on available social security schemes for the
agricultural workers;
b)
Facilitate the filling, processing and forwarding of application forms
for registration of agricultural workers;
c)
Obtain registration from the District Committee and deliver the Identity
Cards to the registered agricultural workers;
d)
Facilitate the enrollment of the registered agricultural workers in
social security schemes; and
e)
Facilitate the delivery of social security benefits through the
institutions designated to deliver such social security (insurance companies,
post offices, Departments of the State/Central Government and other
institutions concerned).
(3) The State Boards shall
compensate the costs incurred by the Workers’ Facilitation Centres for
performance of its functions.
(1) The National Board shall decide
the amount and manner of payment of contribution/fee by the agricultural
workers to the National Social Security Schemes.
(2) For schemes initiated by the
State Boards, the State Board concerned shall decide the contributions of
agricultural workers and employers.
(3) The claim of registered
agricultural workers for social security benefits shall lie solely against the
State Board and it shall be the responsibility of the State Board to settle the
dues, if any.
Chapter
IX
ENFORCEMENT
AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION BODIES
29. Disputes Resolution Council and Conciliation Committees
(1)The State Government
shall, by rules, constitute Dispute Resolution Council (DRC) at District level
and Conciliation Committees (CC) at an appropriate level below the district
level i.e Block/Tehsil/Mandal level, for resolution of disputes relating to the
non observance of provisions of this Act arising amongst the agricultural wage
workers , employers, Workers’ Facilitation Centres and State Boards.
(2)The Composition of the DRCs and CCs shall be tripartite and consist of an officer designated by the State Government to be the Member Secretary, one person nominated from the most representative of membership-based organisations of the agricultural workers in that State, having membership in the district, and a person nominated from the most representative organisation of employers’ organisations in the agricultural sector in the state. The State government, may, if it thinks fit, appoint two persons as assessors to advice the conciliation Committee on the proceedings before it. (3) When there is a complaint regarding sexual harassment, the CC/DRC shall co-opt two other members from the Panchayats/local bodies, who shall be women, at the time of dealing with such complaints. The CC/DRC, if satisfied that a case of sexual harassment is established, direct the employer to ensure that necessary action is taken against the person guilty of such conduct.
(4) The honorarium and/ or the
allowances to be paid to the workers and employers representatives on the DRC
shall be determined by the State Government.
(5) The persons to be appointed as
members from each of the categories specified in sub-section (2), the term of
office and other related conditions, the procedure to be followed in the
discharge of their functions, conduct of meetings, periodicity of meetings and
the manner of filling vacancies among the members of the CC/DRC, shall be such
as may be prescribed by the State Government.
(Note: In order to determine the
most representative organisation, membership figures including the verification
of trade unions carried out by the CLC may be relied upon.)
30.
Functions and powers of the Conciliation Committee and Dispute Resolution
Council
(1)
Any agricultural wage worker or employer or an organisation representing
such worker or Workers’ Facilitation Centres or the State Board may raise a
dispute relating to the non-observance of provisions of this Act by filing a
complaint before the Conciliation Committee in the manner prescribed by the
State Government. The DRC may also take suo
moto cognizance of such disputes.
(2)
Every complaint so filed shall be deemed to be a dispute under this Act
notwithstanding that such a complaint had not been referred to the employer at
the first instance, and been rejected.
(3)
The status of employment of agricultural workers in the dispute raised
before the CC or DRC shall not be affected merely for the reason that a
complaint regarding non observance of provisions of this Act has been raised
before the DRC or CC.
(4)
(a)Upon reference of a dispute, the Conciliation Committee shall proceed
to arrive at a conciliated settlement. The Conciliation Committee shall, for
the purpose of bringing about a settlement of the dispute, without delay,
investigate the dispute and all matters connected therewith, and may do all
such things as they think fit for the purpose of inducing the parties to come
to a fair and amicable settlement of the dispute.
(b) The inspectors
appointed under the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, shall assist the CC/DRC in their
duties and shall carry such investigation of complaints as required by the
CC/DRC.
(c ) Where the CC/DRC
apprehends violation of the provisions of this Act the inspectors may be
directed to investigate and report the matter expeditiously.
(5)
The CC/DRC or the inspectors designated for this purpose under sub-
section 4(b) above may for the purpose of investigating the dispute, after
giving reasonable notice, enter the premises to which the dispute relates. The
Conciliation Committee shall also have the powers under the Code of Civil
Procedure 1908 to enforce the attendance of parties, compel the production of
documents and material objects.
(6)
The Conciliation Committee may if it thinks fit appoint one or more
persons having special knowledge of the matter under consideration to advise it
on the proceeding before it.
(7)
The time limit for the conclusion of the proceedings of the
CC shall not exceed four weeks. Where the parties to the dispute apply in the prescribed manner, whether
jointly or separately, to the CC for the extension of such period and the
member-secretary of the CC considers it necessary or expedient to extend such
period, he/she may for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend such period by
such further period as he/she may think fit;
Provided that no proceedings before a CC shall lapse merely on the ground that the period specified under this sub section has expired without such proceedings being completed.
(8)
If the Conciliation Committee is able to arrive at a conciliated
settlement, it shall record its finding to such effect and shall issue such
directions as considered necessary.
(9)
Upon failure of such conciliation proceedings, the Conciliation
Committee shall record its findings and refer the dispute to the DRC, which
shall within two weeks of receipt of reference, refer the matter to the
adjudicator provided in this section.
(10)
Where a dispute is raised
directly before the DRC, the DRC shall ordinarily refer the dispute to the CC
below it, under whose jurisdiction the dispute falls.
(11)
In cases of disputes raised directly before it or referred to it by the
CC under subsection (9) above, the DRC may itself seek to bring about a
conciliated settlement.
(12)
In such cases, the DRC shall have
all the powers mentioned in section (4) and (5) specified above.
(13)
If the DRC is able to arrive at a conciliated settlement, it shall
record its finding to such effect and shall issue such directions as considered
necessary.
(14)
In case of failure of conciliation, the DRC shall record its
finding and refer the matter directly to the Agricultural Tribunal referred to
in section 31, within 4 weeks of the reference of the dispute. Where the parties to the dispute apply in the prescribed manner,
whether jointly or separately, to the DRC for the extension of such period and
the member-secretary of the DRC considers it necessary or expedient to extend
such period, he/she may for reasons to be recorded in writing, extend such
period by such further period as he/she may think fit.
Provided that no proceedings before a DRC shall lapse merely on the ground that the period specified under this sub section has expired without such proceedings being completed.
(15)
The DRC shall also monitor the functioning of the CCs.
(16)
Where the dispute pertains to any matter covered by any law mentioned in
Section 6(1), the CC/DRC shall forward the complaint to the appropriate
authority created under the relevant Act for adjudication.
31. Adjudication and Constitution of Agricultural Tribunals
(1)
The State Government shall by notification in the Official Gazette
constitute Agricultural Tribunals for each district for the purpose of
adjudication of disputes relating to agricultural workers under this Act.
(2)
The Agricultural Tribunal shall consist of a sole member who
shall an officer of the Government not below the rank of a District Labour
Officer or Deputy Collector for each district, or any officer with experience
as Civil Judge or as Magistrate to be the Adjudicator under the section.
(3)
The Agricultural Tribunal shall hold
sessions in such Block/ Tehsil/Mandal towns and with such frequency, as may be
specified in the rules made in this behalf by the State Government, in order to
adjudicate upon the disputes referred to it by the DRCs at the Block/
Tehsil/Mandal level.
(Note: NO appeal has been
provided for under this Act. Moving the High Courts under Art. 226 of the
Constitution would of course be available).
(4)
The State Government shall issue such notifications and directions as
are necessary to ensure that the adjudication proceedings are concluded
expeditiously with minimum loss of time and costs to the parties involved. The
award of the Agricultural Tribunal shall be publicised in the manner as
prescribed by the State Government.
(5) The designated department(s) of
the State Government concerned shall be responsible for enforcement and
implementation of the provisions of this Act.
32.
Contravention of provisions regarding employment of agricultural workers
(1) Whoever contravenes any
provisions of this Act or the rules made there under, other than those made
punishable under any other law, regarding the employment of agricultural
workers shall be punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to
one year, or with fine which may extend to five thousand rupees, or with both,
and in case of continuing contravention, with additional fine which may extend
up to one hundred rupees for every day during which such contravention
continues.
(2). No court shall take cognizance
of an offence punishable under this Act or the abetment of any such offence,
save on a complaint made by, or the previous sanction in writing of or under
the authority of the State Government. No court inferior to that of a
Metropolitan Magistrate or a judicial magistrate of the first class shall try
any offence punishable under this Act.
(3). No suit, prosecution or other
legal proceeding shall lie against any person for anything done in good faith
or intended to be done in pursuance of this Act or rules.
(4) No court shall take cognisance
of an offence punishable under this Act unless the complaint is made within six
months from the date on which the alleged commission of the offence came to the
knowledge of the CC or the DRC concerned.
(5) Any person who
commits a breach of any conciliated settlement
arrived at in the CC or DRC or final award by the Tribunal, shall be
punishable with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with
fine, or with both, [and where the breach is a continuing one, with a further
fine which may extend to two hundred rupees for every day during which the
breach continues after the conviction for the first] and the Court trying the
offence, if it fines the offender, may direct that the whole or any part of the
fine realized from him shall be paid, by way of compensation, to any person
who, in its opinion, has been injured by such breach.
(6) Where any money is due to an agricultural
worker under a settlement or an award, the workman himself or any other person
authorized by him in writing in this behalf, or, in the case of the death of
the workman, his assignee or heirs may, without prejudice to any other mode of
recovery, make an application to the state government for the recovery of the
money due to him, and if the state government is satisfied that any money is so
due, it shall issue a certificate for that amount to the Collector who shall
proceed to recover the same in the same manner as an arrear of land revenue.
Chapter
X
MISCELLANEOUS
33.
Accounts and Audit
(a) The National Board and
the State Boards shall maintain proper accounts and other relevant records and
prepare annual statements of accounts in such form as may be prescribed.
(b) The National Board shall
furnish to the Central Government, before such date as may be prescribed, the
audited copy of the consolidated account of itself and the Funds together with
the auditor’s report.
34. Power
to make Rules
The Central and State governments
shall have the power to make rules for the purposes of carrying out the objects
of the Act.
35. Savings
(1)This law will not affect the
application of any other State or Central Acts which applies to the
agricultural worker or to the employer under this Act. (Note: Even if the
employer or establishment is covered, the agricultural worker who is not
covered under the formal sector law would get benefit under this law for the
matters covered here).
(2) Notwithstanding anything
contained in this Act, wherever any agricultural worker is eligible for
superior or better benefits under any existing law in force, the worker shall
continue to be entitled for such benefits.
36. Effect of
laws and agreements inconsistent with this Act(1) The provisions of this Act shall
have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any
other law or in the terms of any award, agreement or contract of service,
whether made before or after the coming into force of this Act.
(2) Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to preclude an
agricultural worker from entering into an agreement with his/her employer for
granting him/her rights or privileges in respect of any matter which are more
favourable to him/ her than those to which he/she would be entitled under this
Act.
* * * * * *
Schedule of the Agricultural Workers Conditions of Work And Social Security Bill, 2007.
(See
section 7 (1))
National
Social Security Scheme for Agricultural Workers
Back ground
The agricultural workers in the
Unorganised Sector face problems that arise out of deficiency or capability deprivation
in terms of inadequate employment, low earnings, low health, etc., as well as
of adversity in the absence of fall back mechanisms (safety net). These workers have limited or no formal
social security cover which increases their vulnerability during times of
illness, old age, unemployment and untimely death. The absence of social security mechanisms is a critical factor in
downturns in the conditions of these households, many of whom are already very
poor. It destroys the workers ability
to contribute meaningfully, and to increasing production and productivity. It
leads to disaffection increasing social costs, widespread crimes, and
persistent ill health. Presently, less than 6% of the entire unorganised sector
workforce has recourse to any social security cover.
Objectives
1. To provide for a right based
entitlement for the agricultural workers, and
2. To provide for a universal
national minimum social security scheme to cover all the workers in the
unorganised agricultural sector in a phased manner within a period of 5 years.
Definitions
Words
and expressions shall have the meaning respectively assigned to them under
Section. 2 of the Act.
Coverage and eligibility
This scheme may be called
the National Social Security Scheme, 2007.
This scheme shall come
into force on….
This
scheme applies to all agricultural workers, hereafter referred to as ‘worker’
to whom the Act extends who
a)
has completed 18 years of age;
b)
whose monthly income does not exceed Rs.7000/- in 2007 (roughly
equivalent to Rs. 6500/- per month recommended by the Indian Labour Conference
held in December 2005);
c)
has submitted a prescribed self-declaration form confirming that he/she
is an agricultural worker not owning or operating a holding of more than two
hectares or such limits as may be notified from time to time by the State government; and
d)
has paid the contribution/ fee as prescribed.
Benefits
The national social
security scheme shall provide for a package of the following minimum benefits:
(a) Health Insurance
(i) Each worker will be
entitled to hospitalization for himself and his family members, costing Rs.
15000 a year in total with Rs. 10000 maximum per ailment in designated,
hospitals or clinics, public or private, recognized by the State Board, with at
least 15 beds. If there is no such clinic available within 10 kilometers from
the worker’s residence, he would be entitled to a transport cost to the nearest
hospital on actuals upto a maximum of 5% of hospital cost. All payments will be
made by the insurance company to the clinics/hospitals directly and except for
the transportation cost, no cash payment will be made to the workers;
(ii)
Maternity Benefits of Rs. 1000 maximum or actuals for the member or the
spouse, per year;
(iii) Sickness cover of Rs
750/- for earning head of family (during hospitalisation) for 15 days (only in
excess of 3 days) during the policy period @ Rs 50/- per day.
(b) Life
and disability cover
In case of Natural
Death: Rs. 30,000/-
In case of Death or total disability due to accident: Rs. 75,000/-
In case of Partial Permanent Disability due to accident: Rs. 37,500/-
(c) Old Age Security
(i)
All BPL agricultural workers will get a monthly pension of Rs. 200 at 60
plus. This would be irrespective of the year of his/her registration with the
scheme.
(ii)
All agricultural workers other than BPL and registered in the scheme
will be entitled to a Provident Fund which will accumulate to his account from
the year of his/her registration.
(iii)
At the end of 60th year the APL agricultural workers will
have 3 options. He can continue with the provident fund scheme by contributing
the full premium i.e. both the government’s and his contribution, or, withdraw
the whole amount of the Provident Fund accumulated to that date, or
alternatively, he could buy an Annuity with the accumulated amount and the
returns would be like his pension.
(iv)
The Provident Fund Scheme can also be used as unemployment insurance.
After 10 years’ contribution, the worker, if he becomes unemployed and is
verified to be so by the Workers
Facilitation Centre (WFC),
he would be entitled to draw up to 50% of the accumulated sum as
unemployment benefits for a period of
6 months. After six months or before that if he
becomes employed again, the worker will be able to continue with the scheme by
renewing his contribution.
Organization
The organization model is federal in character where the implementation
will be the responsibility of the State Social Security and Welfare Board for
agricultural workers (SSSWB) with the assistance of WFC at the grass root
level, supervised and monitored by the National Social Security and Welfare
Board.
The structure is as
follows:
(i)
There will be a National Social Security and Welfare Board (NSSWB) at
the central level, representatively constituted, with the central government as
the prime mover. This National Board will be supervising and monitoring the
implementation of the scheme at different levels and will also be responsible
for running for National Social Security and Welfare Fund.
At the state level there
would be a State Social Security and Welfare Board for agricultural workers
(SSSWB), representatively constituted, which will be the main implementing
agency at the grassroots level through Workers Facilitation Centre (WFC).
(ii)
The WFC would be appointed by the SSSWB, keeping in mind the need to
make them as representative as possible with the participation of
institutions/organisations listed under section 27(1) of the Bill. WFC would
perform the various functions as listed in section 27(2) of the Bill.
(iii)
SSSWBs will negotiate with the insurance agency and other service
providers with the help of NSSWF, the best possible terms for providing the
prescribed benefits and also the selection of health care institutions.
(iv)
SSSWBs would also set up their State Social Security and Welfare Fund
(SSSWF) from sources specified in section 17, which would accumulate till they
are transferred to the accounts of the beneficiaries held by the designated
institutions such as Post Offices/ banks. National Social Security and Welfare
Fund (NSSWF) contribution should also be deposited with SSSWF for being
transmitted to the workers account once the scheme starts implementation.
Financing
The scheme would be financed by the
National Social Security and Welfare Fund (NSSWF) through any of the sources as
specified in section 8 of the Act. However, the share of contribution of the
BPL workers, if any, would be borne by the Central Government.
The total outlay of the scheme
proposed for agricultural workers when all of them are covered is estimated at
Rs 19431 crore, which may be entirely borne by the Central Government. If however, the total cost is shared between
the Centre and States in the ratio of of 75:25, then, the Centre’s and the
State Governments’ share is estimated at Rs 14573 crore and Rs 4858 crore
respectively. The share of both Centre and States could be further reduced, if
contributions of employers and workers or tax/ cess as mentioned in section 8
are available.
UNORGANISED NON-AGRICULTURAL WORKERS’ CONDITIONS OF WORK AND
SOCIAL SECURITY BILL, 2007.
PRELIMINARY
1.
Short title, extent, commencement and application
2.
Definitions
3.
Rules of evidence
Chapter II
CONDITIONS OF WORK TO BE ENSURED FOR THE WAGE WORKER AND
HOME WORKER
4. Physical
Conditions of work
5. Duration of work
6. Conditions of work and payment of wages
Chapter III
SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
7. Framing of schemes.
NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE FUND FOR UNORGANISED
WORKERS
8. Constitution
of a National Fund
NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY AND WELFARE BOARD FOR UNORGANISED
WORKERS
Chapter VI